The Power of Information: State Capacity and Government Responses to Shocks

ABSTRACT This paper examines how informational state capacity shapes governments' ability to respond to external shocks. We introduce a new measure of this capacity based on whether countries maintain up‐to‐date population censuses, vital registries and agricultural censuses. The measure is simple, transparent and broadly available across Global South countries. Examining government responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic, we find that higher informational capacity in 2019 was associated with significantly lower underreporting of cases in 2020. A monthly analysis and robustness checks—including a sensitivity analysis and an alternative construction of our measure—support this result. Beyond monitoring, countries with higher capacity were also more likely to adopt economic relief policies and did so more quickly. The findings suggest that informational state capacity enhances governments' ability to monitor emergencies and respond with timely policy interventions. Our measure further offers a practical indicator for identifying capacity gaps in vulnerable states.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.70185
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Power of Information: State Capacity and Government Responses to Shocks

Michael F. Harsch, Julie Anne Weaver, Alexandra Norris
Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management
Economic Growth and Development
article

The Power of Information: State Capacity and Government Responses to Shocks

Michael F. Harsch, Julie Anne Weaver, Alexandra Norris
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines how informational state capacity shapes governments' ability to respond to external shocks. We introduce a new measure of this capacity based on whether countries maintain up‐to‐date population censuses, vital registries and agricultural censuses. The measure is simple, transparent and broadly available across Global South countries. Examining government responses to the COVID‐19 pandemic, we find that higher informational capacity in 2019 was associated with significantly lower underreporting of cases in 2020. A monthly analysis and robustness checks—including a sensitivity analysis and an alternative construction of our measure—support this result. Beyond monitoring, countries with higher capacity were also more likely to adopt economic relief policies and did so more quickly. The findings suggest that informational state capacity enhances governments' ability to monitor emergencies and respond with timely policy interventions. Our measure further offers a practical indicator for identifying capacity gaps in vulnerable states.

Journal of Contingencies and Crisis ManagementVol. 34(3)
National Defense University (US), Harvard University Press (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Economic Growth and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Power of Information: State Capacity and Government Responses to Shocks — Michael F. Harsch, Julie Anne Weaver, et al. · Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS