Institutional Frictions, Informality Traps, and Decent Work: An Institutional Perspective on <scp>SDGs</scp> 8 and 16 in Fragile Contexts

ABSTRACT Achieving decent work remains a persistent challenge, particularly in economies characterised by institutional fragility and pervasive informality. Although Sustainable Development Goals 8 and 16 emphasise productive employment and effective institutions, progress has often been constrained by the interaction between institutional frictions and labour market informality, especially in fragile and conflict‐affected settings. Despite growing recognition of the importance of these factors, limited cross‐country evidence exists on how their interaction shapes labour market vulnerability. This study examines the relationships between institutional frictions, informality, and decent work outcomes using a panel dataset of 90 countries covering the period 2005–2022. The analysis employs the Dynamic Common Correlated Effects Mean Group (DCCE‐MG) estimator, which is well suited to cross‐country panels because it accounts for cross‐sectional dependence, heterogeneous country‐specific dynamics, and unobserved common shocks. The findings indicate that institutional frictions and informality are each positively associated with vulnerable employment, while their interaction is associated with higher levels of labour market vulnerability. The relationship is significantly stronger in fragile and conflict‐affected settings, consistent with the informality trap framework. The study contributes theoretically by demonstrating how institutional frictions condition the relationship between informality and labour market vulnerability, thereby extending existing discussions of informality in fragile contexts. Methodologically, it applies a robust estimation framework capable of capturing complex cross‐country dynamics. Empirically, the study provides evidence that the relationship between institutional frictions, informality, and vulnerable employment is context‐dependent. The findings underscore the importance of policy approaches that jointly address institutional weaknesses and structural informality to improve decent work outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71482
Primary Topic
International Labor and Employment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional Frictions, Informality Traps, and Decent Work: An Institutional Perspective on SDGs 8 and 16 in Fragile Contexts

Khudoykulov Khurshid Khurramovich, Abdulaziz Khalid Alsharidi
Sustainable Development
International Labor and Employment Law
article

Institutional Frictions, Informality Traps, and Decent Work: An Institutional Perspective on SDGs 8 and 16 in Fragile Contexts

Khudoykulov Khurshid Khurramovich, Abdulaziz Khalid Alsharidi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Achieving decent work remains a persistent challenge, particularly in economies characterised by institutional fragility and pervasive informality. Although Sustainable Development Goals 8 and 16 emphasise productive employment and effective institutions, progress has often been constrained by the interaction between institutional frictions and labour market informality, especially in fragile and conflict‐affected settings. Despite growing recognition of the importance of these factors, limited cross‐country evidence exists on how their interaction shapes labour market vulnerability. This study examines the relationships between institutional frictions, informality, and decent work outcomes using a panel dataset of 90 countries covering the period 2005–2022. The analysis employs the Dynamic Common Correlated Effects Mean Group (DCCE‐MG) estimator, which is well suited to cross‐country panels because it accounts for cross‐sectional dependence, heterogeneous country‐specific dynamics, and unobserved common shocks. The findings indicate that institutional frictions and informality are each positively associated with vulnerable employment, while their interaction is associated with higher levels of labour market vulnerability. The relationship is significantly stronger in fragile and conflict‐affected settings, consistent with the informality trap framework. The study contributes theoretically by demonstrating how institutional frictions condition the relationship between informality and labour market vulnerability, thereby extending existing discussions of informality in fragile contexts. Methodologically, it applies a robust estimation framework capable of capturing complex cross‐country dynamics. Empirically, the study provides evidence that the relationship between institutional frictions, informality, and vulnerable employment is context‐dependent. The findings underscore the importance of policy approaches that jointly address institutional weaknesses and structural informality to improve decent work outcomes.

Sustainable Development
Ferghana Polytechnical Institute (UZ), Tashkent Islamic University (UZ), Termez State University (UZ), King Faisal University (SA), Tashkent State University of Economics (UZ)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
International Labor and Employment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.