The effect of impaction energy and bone quality on cementless femoral implant fixation and femoral periprosthetic fracture risk

Aims Cementless fixation is the predominant method used in hip arthroplasty worldwide; however, seating implants via impaction remains a balancing act – too much energy may cause fracture, and too little may not seat the implant adequately. Currently, the optimal energy level required for femoral implant fixation is unknown, which adversely affects the variability of long-term implant stability. This study investigated how varying impaction energies affect strain behaviour, fracture risk, and implant fixation in synthetic bone models using cementless femoral implants. Methods A standardized surgical technique was used to prepare a total of 20 synthetic bone models (Sawbones) – 12 healthy and eight osteoporotic – for femoral impaction. The implants were impacted at three different energy levels (low, medium, and high) using a validated in vitro rig simulator for soft-tissue compliance, with four specimens tested at each velocity and bone type. Strain behaviour and fracture risk, measured as peak strain, were analyzed using digital image correlation with two high-speed cameras. Implant stability was assessed via pull-out fixation tests. Results Higher impaction energy increased fracture risk but did not significantly increase implant stability. In healthy bone models, mean tensile peak strain was 0.31, 0.69, and 0.97 for low, medium, and high energy strikes, respectively. Osteoporotic models showed the greatest difference between the low and medium energies during the initial two strikes, with peak strains of 0.42 to 0.46 versus 0.79 to 0.84, with subsequent strikes resulting in minimal variation between the two velocities. Implant pull-out forces were similar among the different impaction energy levels within each group (healthy p = 0.10 5 , osteoporotic p = 0.686), and consistently lower in osteoporotic bones across all energy levels. Conclusion These biomechanical findings on synthetic bones confirm that multiple lower-energy strikes lead to similar implant fixation outcomes with lower risk of periprosthetic fracture (lower peak strain). Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2026;15(7):892–902.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bone and Joint Research
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.157.bjr-2025-0532.r1
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of impaction energy and bone quality on cementless femoral implant fixation and femoral periprosthetic fracture risk

M. Abdulhadi Alagha, Justin Peter Cobb, K. C. Geoffrey Ng, Chloe Jordan et al.
Bone and Joint Research
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

The effect of impaction energy and bone quality on cementless femoral implant fixation and femoral periprosthetic fracture risk

M. Abdulhadi Alagha, Justin Peter Cobb, K. C. Geoffrey Ng, Chloe Jordan, Rishabh Gupta
article en

Abstract

Aims Cementless fixation is the predominant method used in hip arthroplasty worldwide; however, seating implants via impaction remains a balancing act – too much energy may cause fracture, and too little may not seat the implant adequately. Currently, the optimal energy level required for femoral implant fixation is unknown, which adversely affects the variability of long-term implant stability. This study investigated how varying impaction energies affect strain behaviour, fracture risk, and implant fixation in synthetic bone models using cementless femoral implants. Methods A standardized surgical technique was used to prepare a total of 20 synthetic bone models (Sawbones) – 12 healthy and eight osteoporotic – for femoral impaction. The implants were impacted at three different energy levels (low, medium, and high) using a validated in vitro rig simulator for soft-tissue compliance, with four specimens tested at each velocity and bone type. Strain behaviour and fracture risk, measured as peak strain, were analyzed using digital image correlation with two high-speed cameras. Implant stability was assessed via pull-out fixation tests. Results Higher impaction energy increased fracture risk but did not significantly increase implant stability. In healthy bone models, mean tensile peak strain was 0.31, 0.69, and 0.97 for low, medium, and high energy strikes, respectively. Osteoporotic models showed the greatest difference between the low and medium energies during the initial two strikes, with peak strains of 0.42 to 0.46 versus 0.79 to 0.84, with subsequent strikes resulting in minimal variation between the two velocities. Implant pull-out forces were similar among the different impaction energy levels within each group (healthy p = 0.10 5 , osteoporotic p = 0.686), and consistently lower in osteoporotic bones across all energy levels. Conclusion These biomechanical findings on synthetic bones confirm that multiple lower-energy strikes lead to similar implant fixation outcomes with lower risk of periprosthetic fracture (lower peak strain). Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2026;15(7):892–902.

Bone and Joint ResearchVol. 15(7)
Western University (CA), Broomfield Hospital (GB), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.