Sources of Variance in Principals’ Ratings of Teaching: Baseline and Within-Year Growth Trends
We utilized two years of teacher observation data from a large urban district to examine the timing, sources of variance, and growth of classroom observation ratings by evaluators and teacher self-assessments. Teachers represented the largest source of variance, and the average teachers’ scores experienced modest within-year increases. We found near-zero variance in individual teacher growth, which may reflect homogeneity or data limitations. Findings affirm the potential of classroom ratings to guide decisions about teachers; however, expectations for within-year growth may need adjustment to reflect modest growth rates. Regularly spaced observations, rather than the fall-heavy schedule observed, may better facilitate implementation.
Authors
- Timothy W. Curby (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8289-1748)
- Seth B. Hunter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3051-872X)
- Katherine M. Bowser (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4771-2272)
Institutions
- George Mason University (US)
- National Council on Teacher Quality (US)
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Leadership and Policy in Schools
- Published
- 2026-07-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2026.2704069
- Primary Topic
- Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00