Assessing the Acceptability of a Wearable Versus Implantable Device for Overdose Detection and Naloxone Administration: Perspectives from Individuals in the Addiction Workforce and Individuals with a History of Opioid Use
BACKGROUND: Use of medical devices for overdose detection and intervention are important for reducing overdose deaths; however, uptake and adoption has been slow. This study explores acceptability of a preclinical wearable versus implantable device, that detects overdose-induced respiratory failure and administers naloxone, among people who use opioids (PWUO) and individuals in the addiction treatment workforce. METHODS: = 126 individuals in the addiction workforce (81% female; 81% White; 13.5% prescribers). RESULTS: > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest acceptability of a device for overdose detection and naloxone administration among PWUO and the addiction workforce, with more acceptability for a wearable versus implantable device. Individual differences should be considered in further testing and dissemination of such devices.
Authors
- V Qui Le
- Brielle L Batch
- Allyson L. Dir (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6004-4692)
- Hyowon Lee
Institutions
- International Rescue Committee (ET)
- MRS Training & Rescue (GB)
- Italian Society of Periodontology and Implantology (IT)
- University School (US)
- Office of Adolescent Health (US)
- Indiana University School of Medicine
- Indiana University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Substance Use & Misuse
- Published
- 2026-07-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2026.2703849
- Primary Topic
- Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00