The decline of research productivity? Hindering factors, remedies and the role of open science

This paper conducts a systematic review of the literature on research productivity to understand its conceptualization, the state of the debate on research productivity decline, and associated hindering factors and remedies. We first categorize the literature into three frameworks: Scientometric, Innovation, Societal Impact. We then focus on the Innovation framework literature, where concerns about declining research productivity are more acute. Based on this literature, we develop a taxonomy of factors hindering research productivity and of the remedies proposed to address them. The taxonomy provides a lens to understand the mechanisms affecting research productivity, and the conditions under which they operate. Our analysis reveals that inefficient R&D routines and misaligned incentives are the primary hindering factors and a key focus for remedies. Finally, we examine the contribution of open science practices to addressing factors influencing research productivity, finding they have potential to improve R&D routines and research governance, thereby promoting knowledge exploration and radical innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics of Innovation and New Technology
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2026.2700595
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The decline of research productivity? Hindering factors, remedies and the role of open science

Diego Chavarro, Valeria Arza, Hugo Confraria, Tommaso Ciarli
Economics of Innovation and New Technology
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

The decline of research productivity? Hindering factors, remedies and the role of open science

Diego Chavarro, Valeria Arza, Hugo Confraria, Tommaso Ciarli
article en

Abstract

This paper conducts a systematic review of the literature on research productivity to understand its conceptualization, the state of the debate on research productivity decline, and associated hindering factors and remedies. We first categorize the literature into three frameworks: Scientometric, Innovation, Societal Impact. We then focus on the Innovation framework literature, where concerns about declining research productivity are more acute. Based on this literature, we develop a taxonomy of factors hindering research productivity and of the remedies proposed to address them. The taxonomy provides a lens to understand the mechanisms affecting research productivity, and the conditions under which they operate. Our analysis reveals that inefficient R&D routines and misaligned incentives are the primary hindering factors and a key focus for remedies. Finally, we examine the contribution of open science practices to addressing factors influencing research productivity, finding they have potential to improve R&D routines and research governance, thereby promoting knowledge exploration and radical innovation.

Economics of Innovation and New Technology
National University of General San Martín (AR), European Commission (BE), United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (NL), Clinical Research Solutions (US), Universidad Nacional de San Martín (PE)
European Commission
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.