Beyond inclusion and participation: power-sharing and disability justice in participatory action research with disabled youth

Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) can democratize knowledge production with disabled youth, challenging oppressive research dynamics. Power sharing is crucial in YPAR, yet the intersection of adultism and ableism remains underexamined. This scoping review addresses two questions: (1) How is power sharing with disabled youth conceptualized in YPAR? (2) How is it practiced? Only 48% of articles conceptualized power sharing, defining it as awareness of power/positionality, democratic decision-making within a youth-rights framework, focusing on youth-adult relationships, and positioning disabled youth as experts and thought leaders in society. Stated participatory design was the most common example of power sharing. Other examples included: training and knowledge sharing, flexible procedures, reflection and feedback, youth support and relationship building, decision-making/group process, minimizing adult involvement, and consent. Challenges to power sharing included concerns about authenticity and full participation, imbalances in knowledge, communication, access, and assistance, IRB and ethical considerations, and relationship dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability & Society
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2026.2698948
Primary Topic
Participatory Visual Research Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond inclusion and participation: power-sharing and disability justice in participatory action research with disabled youth

Angela Malorni, Naomi Fair, Bailey Allred
Disability & Society
Participatory Visual Research Methods
article

Beyond inclusion and participation: power-sharing and disability justice in participatory action research with disabled youth

Angela Malorni, Naomi Fair, Bailey Allred
article en

Abstract

Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) can democratize knowledge production with disabled youth, challenging oppressive research dynamics. Power sharing is crucial in YPAR, yet the intersection of adultism and ableism remains underexamined. This scoping review addresses two questions: (1) How is power sharing with disabled youth conceptualized in YPAR? (2) How is it practiced? Only 48% of articles conceptualized power sharing, defining it as awareness of power/positionality, democratic decision-making within a youth-rights framework, focusing on youth-adult relationships, and positioning disabled youth as experts and thought leaders in society. Stated participatory design was the most common example of power sharing. Other examples included: training and knowledge sharing, flexible procedures, reflection and feedback, youth support and relationship building, decision-making/group process, minimizing adult involvement, and consent. Challenges to power sharing included concerns about authenticity and full participation, imbalances in knowledge, communication, access, and assistance, IRB and ethical considerations, and relationship dynamics.

Disability & Society
Association of University Centers on Disabilities (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Participatory Visual Research Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.