Reassessing the health–agriculture nexus: evidence from super-efficiency DEA and panel models in OECD countries

BACKGROUND: Agricultural productivity and health expenditures are closely interconnected, influencing both economic development and social welfare. Despite growing interest in the health-agriculture nexus, empirical evidence on their bidirectional relationship across Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries remains limited. METHODS: This study investigates the relationship between health expenditures and agricultural productivity using an dataset covering 38 OECD countries from 2010 to 2021. In the first stage, agricultural productivity was measured using a Super-Efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model, allowing for the ranking of efficient countries beyond the conventional efficiency frontier. In the second stage, panel data models were employed to examine the effects of health expenditure indicators on agricultural productivity and the reverse effects of agricultural productivity on health expenditures. RESULTS: The findings indicate substantial heterogeneity in agricultural productivity across OECD countries. Panel estimations reveal that public health expenditures have a positive and statistically significant effect on agricultural productivity, whereas private and out-of-pocket health expenditures exhibit limited or insignificant effects. Furthermore, higher agricultural productivity is associated with increases in per capita and public health expenditures, suggesting a reciprocal relationship between agricultural performance and health investment. The results highlight the importance of health financing in strengthening labor productivity and supporting sustainable agricultural development. CONCLUSIONS: Health expenditures contribute not only to improved population health but also to enhanced agricultural efficiency and economic performance. Policies aimed at expanding public healthcare investments, particularly in rural areas, may generate productivity gains in agriculture while promoting broader sustainable development objectives. By integrating Super-Efficiency DEA with panel econometric techniques, this study provides novel empirical evidence on the health-agriculture nexus in OECD countries and offers relevant policy implications for both health and agricultural sectors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28477-9
Primary Topic
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reassessing the health–agriculture nexus: evidence from super-efficiency DEA and panel models in OECD countries

Fuad SELAMZADE
BMC Public Health
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
article

Reassessing the health–agriculture nexus: evidence from super-efficiency DEA and panel models in OECD countries

Fuad SELAMZADE
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Agricultural productivity and health expenditures are closely interconnected, influencing both economic development and social welfare. Despite growing interest in the health-agriculture nexus, empirical evidence on their bidirectional relationship across Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries remains limited. METHODS: This study investigates the relationship between health expenditures and agricultural productivity using an dataset covering 38 OECD countries from 2010 to 2021. In the first stage, agricultural productivity was measured using a Super-Efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model, allowing for the ranking of efficient countries beyond the conventional efficiency frontier. In the second stage, panel data models were employed to examine the effects of health expenditure indicators on agricultural productivity and the reverse effects of agricultural productivity on health expenditures. RESULTS: The findings indicate substantial heterogeneity in agricultural productivity across OECD countries. Panel estimations reveal that public health expenditures have a positive and statistically significant effect on agricultural productivity, whereas private and out-of-pocket health expenditures exhibit limited or insignificant effects. Furthermore, higher agricultural productivity is associated with increases in per capita and public health expenditures, suggesting a reciprocal relationship between agricultural performance and health investment. The results highlight the importance of health financing in strengthening labor productivity and supporting sustainable agricultural development. CONCLUSIONS: Health expenditures contribute not only to improved population health but also to enhanced agricultural efficiency and economic performance. Policies aimed at expanding public healthcare investments, particularly in rural areas, may generate productivity gains in agriculture while promoting broader sustainable development objectives. By integrating Super-Efficiency DEA with panel econometric techniques, this study provides novel empirical evidence on the health-agriculture nexus in OECD countries and offers relevant policy implications for both health and agricultural sectors.

BMC Public Health
Muş Alparslan University (TR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.