Improving Measurement and Priorities for Assessment in Clinical Trials of childhood-onset Dystonia International Core Outcome Set (Dystonia IMPACT-COS): A protocol

<ns5:p>Introduction Dystonia is a movement disorder characterised by abnormal movements and/or postures, initiated or worsened by voluntary action. Non-degenerative childhood dystonia is common, represents a substantial source of lifelong disability, and is often associated with other motor and non-motor phenotypes that can contribute to functional impairments. However, there is no consensus on how to measure motor and non-motor outcomes associated with dystonia, nor is there consensus on what outcomes to measure. This prevents adequate evaluation and development of evidence-based interventions and decision-making in clinical practice. Here, we present the protocol for establishing global expert consensus on the Dystonia Impact Core Outcome Set (DI-COS) to describe what dystonia-associated outcomes to measure and how to measure them. Methods and analysis The DI-COS study includes a mixed-methods programme with three phases. Phase 1 includes; (i) scoping review, (ii) qualitative interview study with children and families, and (iii) international survey of health, social care, and education-based professionals. Phase 2 is a three round international e-Delphi study informed by Phase 1, and expert consensus from: (i) a professional panel and (ii) experts with lived experience (parents and children). Content and thematic analysis, and descriptive statistics will be used to analyse qualitative and quantitative data, respectively. Results will be triangulated to inform development of the Delphi survey in Phase 2. Phase 3 will identify the outcome measures available and recommend assessment outcomes agreed as part of Phase 2 Consensus. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been obtained from Camden and King’s Cross Research Ethics Committee (25/LO/0150) and Queen Mary, University of London Research Ethics Committee. All dissemination activities (including papers submitted to peer-reviewed journals, abstracts submitted to national/international conferences, visual outputs and engagement events), will be co-produced, co-designed and co-presented/authored with members of the study’s advisory groups and shared via project’s networks.</ns5:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NIHR Open Research
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.14354.1
Primary Topic
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Measurement and Priorities for Assessment in Clinical Trials of childhood-onset Dystonia International Core Outcome Set (Dystonia IMPACT-COS): A protocol

Daniel Edward Lumsden, Hendriekje Eggink, Claire Higgins, Hannah May Scott et al.
NIHR Open Research
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
article

Improving Measurement and Priorities for Assessment in Clinical Trials of childhood-onset Dystonia International Core Outcome Set (Dystonia IMPACT-COS): A protocol

Daniel Edward Lumsden, Hendriekje Eggink, Claire Higgins, Hannah May Scott, Jonathan W. Mink, Jean‐Pierre Lin, Katherine Knighting, Kirsty Stewart, Hortensia Gimeno, Belén Pérez Dueñas, Eva María Navarrete Muñoz, Rob Molloy, Peter L Rosenbaum, Darcy Fehlings, A Simon Harvey, Khamani Edwards, Grace Stynes, Ellie Simpson, Marina de Koning-Tijssen, Enna Thea Kul-Want, Eleanor P Redding, Paula S C Chagas, Georgia A Vine, Emmanuel Roze, Barbara Gonçalves, Bhooma R Aravamuthan
article en

Abstract

<ns5:p>Introduction Dystonia is a movement disorder characterised by abnormal movements and/or postures, initiated or worsened by voluntary action. Non-degenerative childhood dystonia is common, represents a substantial source of lifelong disability, and is often associated with other motor and non-motor phenotypes that can contribute to functional impairments. However, there is no consensus on how to measure motor and non-motor outcomes associated with dystonia, nor is there consensus on what outcomes to measure. This prevents adequate evaluation and development of evidence-based interventions and decision-making in clinical practice. Here, we present the protocol for establishing global expert consensus on the Dystonia Impact Core Outcome Set (DI-COS) to describe what dystonia-associated outcomes to measure and how to measure them. Methods and analysis The DI-COS study includes a mixed-methods programme with three phases. Phase 1 includes; (i) scoping review, (ii) qualitative interview study with children and families, and (iii) international survey of health, social care, and education-based professionals. Phase 2 is a three round international e-Delphi study informed by Phase 1, and expert consensus from: (i) a professional panel and (ii) experts with lived experience (parents and children). Content and thematic analysis, and descriptive statistics will be used to analyse qualitative and quantitative data, respectively. Results will be triangulated to inform development of the Delphi survey in Phase 2. Phase 3 will identify the outcome measures available and recommend assessment outcomes agreed as part of Phase 2 Consensus. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been obtained from Camden and King’s Cross Research Ethics Committee (25/LO/0150) and Queen Mary, University of London Research Ethics Committee. All dissemination activities (including papers submitted to peer-reviewed journals, abstracts submitted to national/international conferences, visual outputs and engagement events), will be co-produced, co-designed and co-presented/authored with members of the study’s advisory groups and shared via project’s networks.</ns5:p>

NIHR Open ResearchVol. 6
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR), Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Royal Children's Hospital (AU), University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Huddersfield (GB), Inserm (FR), Edge Hill University (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital (CA), Children's Hospital at Westmead (AU), Sorbonne Université (FR), Dystonia Medical Research Foundation Canada (CA), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (ES), London Borough of Tower Hamlets (GB), Whittington Health NHS Trust (GB), Institut du Cerveau (FR), McMaster University (CA)
Queen Mary University of London, Barts Charity, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Health NHS Trust
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.