Learning Misconduct in Organisations: A Realist Account of Social Learning Perspectives

This chapter examines the contribution of social learning perspectives to understanding organisational misconduct, with focus on how learning processes are mediated by organisational culture. Beginning with Sutherland’s ‘differential association’, the chapter traces the development of social learning within criminology and reviews its application to organisational misconduct. While social learning perspectives provide persuasive accounts of how norms, techniques, and justifications for misconduct are transmitted through interaction, imitation, and reinforcement, we argue that such perspectives often remain analytically shallow when applied to complex organisational settings. To address this, we assess the ‘practical adequacy’ of social learning and propose refinement through a critical realist framework. By conceptualising differential association, definitions, differential reinforcement, and imitation as causal mechanisms embedded within layered organisational structures and cultures, we demonstrate how social learning can be repurposed to generate more robust explanations of organisational misconduct. Organisational culture is positioned as a central mediating layer through which these mechanisms are activated or constrained. We conclude that social learning perspectives offer neither universal nor sufficient explanations of organisational misconduct, but when integrated with attention to structural conditions, social relations, and cultural dynamics, they offer valuable middle-range insights into how misconduct emerges and becomes normalised within organisations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
CrimRxiv
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.f129616a
Primary Topic
Critical Realism in Sociology
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Learning Misconduct in Organisations: A Realist Account of Social Learning Perspectives

N. J. Lord, Jonathan Davies
CrimRxiv
Critical Realism in Sociology
preprint

Learning Misconduct in Organisations: A Realist Account of Social Learning Perspectives

N. J. Lord, Jonathan Davies
preprint en

Abstract

This chapter examines the contribution of social learning perspectives to understanding organisational misconduct, with focus on how learning processes are mediated by organisational culture. Beginning with Sutherland’s ‘differential association’, the chapter traces the development of social learning within criminology and reviews its application to organisational misconduct. While social learning perspectives provide persuasive accounts of how norms, techniques, and justifications for misconduct are transmitted through interaction, imitation, and reinforcement, we argue that such perspectives often remain analytically shallow when applied to complex organisational settings. To address this, we assess the ‘practical adequacy’ of social learning and propose refinement through a critical realist framework. By conceptualising differential association, definitions, differential reinforcement, and imitation as causal mechanisms embedded within layered organisational structures and cultures, we demonstrate how social learning can be repurposed to generate more robust explanations of organisational misconduct. Organisational culture is positioned as a central mediating layer through which these mechanisms are activated or constrained. We conclude that social learning perspectives offer neither universal nor sufficient explanations of organisational misconduct, but when integrated with attention to structural conditions, social relations, and cultural dynamics, they offer valuable middle-range insights into how misconduct emerges and becomes normalised within organisations.

CrimRxiv
Reduced inequalities
Critical Realism in Sociology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.