Designing a stigma reduction intervention in Zambia: perspectives of young people with HIV and key stakeholders using the consolidated framework for implementation research

BACKGROUND: Young people with HIV (YPWH) in Zambia and other low-income settings in Africa experience the compounded effects of intersecting HIV and poverty stigma. Meanwhile, limited research using structured implementation science frameworks has informed the development of interventions to address this intersectional stigma. We sought to address this gap by applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to explore perspectives of YPWH and key stakeholders (service providers, local government representatives) on the design and implementation of interventions to reduce intersectional stigma. METHODS: This study employed a qualitative case study design using in-depth interviews with 54 purposively sampled participants, including 32 young people with HIV (YPWH) and 22 key informants comprising stakeholders involved in implementing HIV-related services. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Proposed intervention elements within the CFIR Innovation domain included compatibility with the local context, integration with health education, and the inclusion of psychosocial support and economic components, such as vocational training, small business development, and loans and savings groups. Outer Setting domains included engaging community leaders and stakeholders and leveraging existing community structures and resources to disrupt HIV and poverty stigma. Inner Setting domains comprised a supportive institutional climate, such as youth-friendly spaces, and support groups that foster experience-sharing and solidarity among YPWH. Characteristics of Individuals included strategies for improving knowledge, attitudes, and skills, as well as peer-led dialogues and role modeling. Finally, the Process domains included adopting participatory approaches and using digital platforms and social media to enhance communication. CONCLUSION: This study builds on existing stigma-reduction interventions by offering actionable guidance for implementing intersectional HIV and poverty stigma interventions informed by YPWH and stakeholders. This study advances implementation science by integrating economic empowerment and HIV stigma reduction within an intersectional framework and using the CFIR to elucidate contextual determinants shaping intervention uptake, delivery, and outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28544-1
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing a stigma reduction intervention in Zambia: perspectives of young people with HIV and key stakeholders using the consolidated framework for implementation research

Dicky Baruah, Don Operario, Kenneth Manda, Rainier Masa et al.
BMC Public Health
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Designing a stigma reduction intervention in Zambia: perspectives of young people with HIV and key stakeholders using the consolidated framework for implementation research

Dicky Baruah, Don Operario, Kenneth Manda, Rainier Masa, Hikabasa Halwiindi, Joseph Mumba Zulu, Mirriam Zulu, Joan Wanyama, Ackim Musukwa
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Young people with HIV (YPWH) in Zambia and other low-income settings in Africa experience the compounded effects of intersecting HIV and poverty stigma. Meanwhile, limited research using structured implementation science frameworks has informed the development of interventions to address this intersectional stigma. We sought to address this gap by applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to explore perspectives of YPWH and key stakeholders (service providers, local government representatives) on the design and implementation of interventions to reduce intersectional stigma. METHODS: This study employed a qualitative case study design using in-depth interviews with 54 purposively sampled participants, including 32 young people with HIV (YPWH) and 22 key informants comprising stakeholders involved in implementing HIV-related services. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Proposed intervention elements within the CFIR Innovation domain included compatibility with the local context, integration with health education, and the inclusion of psychosocial support and economic components, such as vocational training, small business development, and loans and savings groups. Outer Setting domains included engaging community leaders and stakeholders and leveraging existing community structures and resources to disrupt HIV and poverty stigma. Inner Setting domains comprised a supportive institutional climate, such as youth-friendly spaces, and support groups that foster experience-sharing and solidarity among YPWH. Characteristics of Individuals included strategies for improving knowledge, attitudes, and skills, as well as peer-led dialogues and role modeling. Finally, the Process domains included adopting participatory approaches and using digital platforms and social media to enhance communication. CONCLUSION: This study builds on existing stigma-reduction interventions by offering actionable guidance for implementing intersectional HIV and poverty stigma interventions informed by YPWH and stakeholders. This study advances implementation science by integrating economic empowerment and HIV stigma reduction within an intersectional framework and using the CFIR to elucidate contextual determinants shaping intervention uptake, delivery, and outcomes.

BMC Public Health
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Emory University (US), University of Johannesburg (ZA), University of Zambia (ZM)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.