Is Misinformation All Around Us? Citizens’ Perceptions of Misinformation Nearness Regarding Its Span, Availability, and Accessibility

This study investigates to what extent and how people perceive misinformation as a proximate phenomenon that has infiltrated their everyday digital news domains. Via a survey (US and the Netherlands, N = 1396), that uniquely tasked people with providing hyperlinks to both misinformation and credible information, we explored the perceived span, availability, and accessibility of misinformation. First, citizens’ understanding of misinformation seems to be subject to concept creep as it extends beyond strictly false content by including biased and politically motivated information. Second, when identifying sources of misinformation, respondents more often pointed to mainstream and widely accessible sources, such as partisan news outlets and social media, rather than fringe or extremist sources. Third, misinformation is perceived to be easily obtainable, while credible information remains more accessible. These findings underscore high levels of perceived misinformation nearness among citizens, which could be concerning as it is found to correlate with estimations of misinformation as more threatening and omnipresent. This study highlights the challenges audiences experience when curating their digital news diets in ways that avoid contamination by misinformation and inaccuracies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Journalism
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2026.2700585
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Misinformation All Around Us? Citizens’ Perceptions of Misinformation Nearness Regarding Its Span, Availability, and Accessibility

Michael Hameleers, Toni G.L.A. van der Meer
Digital Journalism
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Is Misinformation All Around Us? Citizens’ Perceptions of Misinformation Nearness Regarding Its Span, Availability, and Accessibility

Michael Hameleers, Toni G.L.A. van der Meer
article en

Abstract

This study investigates to what extent and how people perceive misinformation as a proximate phenomenon that has infiltrated their everyday digital news domains. Via a survey (US and the Netherlands, N = 1396), that uniquely tasked people with providing hyperlinks to both misinformation and credible information, we explored the perceived span, availability, and accessibility of misinformation. First, citizens’ understanding of misinformation seems to be subject to concept creep as it extends beyond strictly false content by including biased and politically motivated information. Second, when identifying sources of misinformation, respondents more often pointed to mainstream and widely accessible sources, such as partisan news outlets and social media, rather than fringe or extremist sources. Third, misinformation is perceived to be easily obtainable, while credible information remains more accessible. These findings underscore high levels of perceived misinformation nearness among citizens, which could be concerning as it is found to correlate with estimations of misinformation as more threatening and omnipresent. This study highlights the challenges audiences experience when curating their digital news diets in ways that avoid contamination by misinformation and inaccuracies.

Digital Journalism
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.