“All Has Been Transferred to Inner Space”: Juan Mateos, Robert Taft, and the Early Egyptian Monastic Office from a Jesuit Perspective

This paper explores the tendency of two great modern Jesuit liturgical scholars—Robert Taft and Juan Mateos—to describe the early Egyptian monastic office as deficiently or insufficiently liturgical, as merely common Scriptural meditation rather than liturgical ceremony properly speaking. It analyzes this view in the context of their wider accounts of the cathedral/monastic office distinction. It offers an argument for one possible source of their scholarly assessment: viz., that early Egyptian monastic practice serves for both Jesuits as a proxy or stand-in for the liturgical/prayer practice of the Society of Jesus. It suggests that in their judgment of early Egypt and in their zeal for a restored cathedral-style office, Taft and Mateos both recapitulate Liturgical Movement arguments against certain Ignatian methods of prayer and criticize the sources that would have shaped their own Jesuit formation, arguing for an emphasis on the social and communal over the (merely) individual and interior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Liturgica
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00393207261465429
Primary Topic
Medieval History and Crusades
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“All Has Been Transferred to Inner Space”: Juan Mateos, Robert Taft, and the Early Egyptian Monastic Office from a Jesuit Perspective

Matthew David Cortese
Studia Liturgica
Medieval History and Crusades
article

“All Has Been Transferred to Inner Space”: Juan Mateos, Robert Taft, and the Early Egyptian Monastic Office from a Jesuit Perspective

Matthew David Cortese
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the tendency of two great modern Jesuit liturgical scholars—Robert Taft and Juan Mateos—to describe the early Egyptian monastic office as deficiently or insufficiently liturgical, as merely common Scriptural meditation rather than liturgical ceremony properly speaking. It analyzes this view in the context of their wider accounts of the cathedral/monastic office distinction. It offers an argument for one possible source of their scholarly assessment: viz., that early Egyptian monastic practice serves for both Jesuits as a proxy or stand-in for the liturgical/prayer practice of the Society of Jesus. It suggests that in their judgment of early Egypt and in their zeal for a restored cathedral-style office, Taft and Mateos both recapitulate Liturgical Movement arguments against certain Ignatian methods of prayer and criticize the sources that would have shaped their own Jesuit formation, arguing for an emphasis on the social and communal over the (merely) individual and interior.

Studia Liturgica
University of Notre Dame (US)
University of Notre Dame
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Medieval History and Crusades
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.