Adjunctive vitamin D supplementation in women receiving dienogest therapy for endometriosis: a randomized controlled trial

Endometriosis is a chronic, estrogen-dependent inflammatory disease that causes debilitating pain and significantly impairs quality of life. Due to its anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, vitamin D has been proposed as a potential therapeutic agent, but clinical evidence remains inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on pain symptoms and quality of life in women with endometriosis. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted on 66 women with symptomatic endometriosis and vitamin D levels below 30 ng/mL. Participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n = 33), receiving 4000 IU of vitamin D every other day, or the control group (n = 33), receiving a matching placebo for eight weeks. Crucially, all participants in both groups continued their standard dienogest (Verogest) therapy. The primary outcomes were pain severity, assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the ENDOPAIN-4D questionnaire, and quality of life as secondary outcome, assessed with the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30). Outcomes were measured at baseline and after the eight-week intervention. All 66 participants completed the trial. Despite baseline imbalances in socio-demographic characteristics (quantified via standardized mean differences), adjusting for these variables as covariates did not yield significant differences between groups. Regarding the ENDOPAIN-4D scores, for the "usual level of pain," the post-intervention mean score was 38.8 (SD = 6.5) in the vitamin D group compared to 50.1 (SD = 7.4) in the placebo group (adjusted mean difference [AMD]: -11.3; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: -26.2 to 3.5; P = 0.136). For the "worst level of pain," the post-intervention mean score was 23.6 (SD = 3.1) in the vitamin D group and 25.6 (SD = 3.5) in the placebo group (AMD: -2.0; 95% CI: -9.0 to 4.9; P = 0.492). The adjusted mean post-intervention VAS score was 5.8 (SD = 0.3) in the vitamin D group versus 6.2 (SD = 0.4) in the placebo group (AMD: -0.3; 95% CI: -1.3 to 0.5; P = 0.113). No significant differences were observed in the ENDOPAIN-4D scores or in any of the five domains of the EHP-30 questionnaire (all P > 0.05). In women under hormonal suppression with dienogest, eight weeks of adjunctive vitamin D did not yield statistically or clinically significant improvements in pain or quality of life. These null findings likely reflect a "floor effect" from the baseline hormonal therapy and are limited by the lack of biochemical confirmation of repletion. These findings are specific to adjunctive use and may not reflect the potential of vitamin D as a monotherapy.Trial registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) IRCT20120718010324N78. Date of first registration 2023-05-25. URL https//irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/68131.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-62548-6
Primary Topic
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adjunctive vitamin D supplementation in women receiving dienogest therapy for endometriosis: a randomized controlled trial

Khadije Hajizadeh, Mojgan Mirghafourvand‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬, Elnaz Shaseb, Fatemeh Shabani et al.
Scientific Reports
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
article

Adjunctive vitamin D supplementation in women receiving dienogest therapy for endometriosis: a randomized controlled trial

Khadije Hajizadeh, Mojgan Mirghafourvand‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬, Elnaz Shaseb, Fatemeh Shabani, Marzieh Parizad Nasirkandy, Mahsa Hesami, Vahideh Rahmani
article en

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic, estrogen-dependent inflammatory disease that causes debilitating pain and significantly impairs quality of life. Due to its anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, vitamin D has been proposed as a potential therapeutic agent, but clinical evidence remains inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on pain symptoms and quality of life in women with endometriosis. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted on 66 women with symptomatic endometriosis and vitamin D levels below 30 ng/mL. Participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n = 33), receiving 4000 IU of vitamin D every other day, or the control group (n = 33), receiving a matching placebo for eight weeks. Crucially, all participants in both groups continued their standard dienogest (Verogest) therapy. The primary outcomes were pain severity, assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the ENDOPAIN-4D questionnaire, and quality of life as secondary outcome, assessed with the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30). Outcomes were measured at baseline and after the eight-week intervention. All 66 participants completed the trial. Despite baseline imbalances in socio-demographic characteristics (quantified via standardized mean differences), adjusting for these variables as covariates did not yield significant differences between groups. Regarding the ENDOPAIN-4D scores, for the "usual level of pain," the post-intervention mean score was 38.8 (SD = 6.5) in the vitamin D group compared to 50.1 (SD = 7.4) in the placebo group (adjusted mean difference [AMD]: -11.3; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: -26.2 to 3.5; P = 0.136). For the "worst level of pain," the post-intervention mean score was 23.6 (SD = 3.1) in the vitamin D group and 25.6 (SD = 3.5) in the placebo group (AMD: -2.0; 95% CI: -9.0 to 4.9; P = 0.492). The adjusted mean post-intervention VAS score was 5.8 (SD = 0.3) in the vitamin D group versus 6.2 (SD = 0.4) in the placebo group (AMD: -0.3; 95% CI: -1.3 to 0.5; P = 0.113). No significant differences were observed in the ENDOPAIN-4D scores or in any of the five domains of the EHP-30 questionnaire (all P > 0.05). In women under hormonal suppression with dienogest, eight weeks of adjunctive vitamin D did not yield statistically or clinically significant improvements in pain or quality of life. These null findings likely reflect a "floor effect" from the baseline hormonal therapy and are limited by the lack of biochemical confirmation of repletion. These findings are specific to adjunctive use and may not reflect the potential of vitamin D as a monotherapy.Trial registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) IRCT20120718010324N78. Date of first registration 2023-05-25. URL https//irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/68131.

Scientific Reports
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.