Integrating Oral Health Into Pandemic Preparedness and Response: Missed Opportunities and Strategic Imperatives for Global Health System Resilience and Security

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence linking oral health to severe COVID-19 outcomes and its potential role in surveillance and service delivery, integration remained absent. This study enquired about: (1) representation of oral health in national COVID-19 taskforces and funding; (2) policy-level barriers to inclusion; (3) lessons from maintaining essential services; and (4) strategies for mobilizing oral health professionals in future emergencies. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review guided by the PRISMA-ScR framework. Systematic searches were performed in PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus (2000-2025) using tailored search strings combining key terms: oral health, pandemic preparedness, COVID-19, dentistry, health systems and related MeSH terms. Eligible evidence included peer-reviewed studies, reviews, policy documents and commentaries in English. Non-human studies were excluded. Data were charted using the WHO Health System Building Blocks framework. RESULTS: After dual-reviewer screening, 2569-3860 records were screened, yielding 5-8 eligible studies per question (26 studies total). The evidence revealed a consistent narrative of systemic exclusion yet operational resilience. For representation, oral health professionals were almost universally absent from national COVID-19 task forces, with dedicated financial support entirely lacking. Regarding barriers, policy integration was hindered by the framing of oral care as non-essential, its omission from global health security architectures like the International Health Regulations, and limited professional advocacy. In contrast, lessons from service adaptation demonstrated that essential care was maintained through the rapid adoption of triage, teledentistry, robust infection control and effective communication. On workforce mobilization, while consensus existed on the potential for OHPs to expand into roles such as vaccination and surveillance, implementation was obstructed by a lack of pre-emergency training, formal deployment mechanisms and regulatory frameworks with minimal linkage to international instruments. CONCLUSION: The review reflects systemic neglect of oral health, with the literature dominated by descriptions of clinical and operational adaptations rather than formal policy integration. We identify missed opportunities in leveraging OHPs for pandemic response and propose embedding oral health within One Health governance, financing, surveillance and emergency response structures to build more resilient health systems.