The Synoptic, Microphysical, and Radar Characteristics of Upper Great Lakes Snow Events

Abstract The upper Great Lakes region is well‐known for significant snowfall during the winter months. The microphysical characteristics of the snow depend to a great degree on snow particle formation and growth processes that are linked to regime‐dependent environmental conditions. A self‐organizing map (SOM) was generated from over a decade of mean sea level pressure reanalyzes during winter months to classify the environment into lake‐effect, synoptically forced, or ambiguous regimes. These regimes were then evaluated with respect to snow microphysical and bulk accumulation observations at Marquette, Michigan, near the southern shore of Lake Superior, and linked to radar‐derived quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) variability. Once event categories are defined by the SOM, it is possible to evaluate the microphysical characteristics of the different regime types. Synoptic snow forms over a deeper layer, has higher radar reflectivities, and features different particle size distributions when compared to lake‐effect snow events. The disparate microphysical characteristics mean that the different regimes exhibit distinct radar reflectivity to snow liquid water equivalent rate ( Z ‐to‐ S ) relationships. Existing Z ‐to‐ S relationships used for operational QPE do not adequately represent both synoptic and lake effect snow, as they tend to overestimate snow from lake effect events and underestimate synoptic snowfall at higher reflectivity values. It is recommended that operational radar users adjust their Z ‐to‐ S relationship to match the regime‐dependent forcing mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2026jd046349
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Synoptic, Microphysical, and Radar Characteristics of Upper Great Lakes Snow Events

Mark S. Kulie, Timothy J. Wagner, Marian E. Mateling, Claire Pettersen et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
article

The Synoptic, Microphysical, and Radar Characteristics of Upper Great Lakes Snow Events

Mark S. Kulie, Timothy J. Wagner, Marian E. Mateling, Claire Pettersen, Jack Richter
article en

Abstract

Abstract The upper Great Lakes region is well‐known for significant snowfall during the winter months. The microphysical characteristics of the snow depend to a great degree on snow particle formation and growth processes that are linked to regime‐dependent environmental conditions. A self‐organizing map (SOM) was generated from over a decade of mean sea level pressure reanalyzes during winter months to classify the environment into lake‐effect, synoptically forced, or ambiguous regimes. These regimes were then evaluated with respect to snow microphysical and bulk accumulation observations at Marquette, Michigan, near the southern shore of Lake Superior, and linked to radar‐derived quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) variability. Once event categories are defined by the SOM, it is possible to evaluate the microphysical characteristics of the different regime types. Synoptic snow forms over a deeper layer, has higher radar reflectivities, and features different particle size distributions when compared to lake‐effect snow events. The disparate microphysical characteristics mean that the different regimes exhibit distinct radar reflectivity to snow liquid water equivalent rate ( Z ‐to‐ S ) relationships. Existing Z ‐to‐ S relationships used for operational QPE do not adequately represent both synoptic and lake effect snow, as they tend to overestimate snow from lake effect events and underestimate synoptic snowfall at higher reflectivity values. It is recommended that operational radar users adjust their Z ‐to‐ S relationship to match the regime‐dependent forcing mechanisms.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 131(14)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Michigan (US), NOAA National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Service (US), NOAA Center for Satellite Applications and Research (US), Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites (US)
National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.