A necessary but not sufficient intervention: Implementing safe and together across Scottish and English sites

BACKGROUND: Child welfare responses to domestic violence and abuse often blame mothers for "failing to protect" while ignoring perpetrators. The Safe & Together model promises transformation through perpetrator pattern-focused assessment. OBJECTIVE: To examine how S&T implementation translates into practice across diverse UK child welfare contexts. METHODS: Focus groups with 55 professionals across five Scottish and English sites were analyzed using Two-Stage Reflexive Implementation Analysis, integrating reflexive thematic analysis with Proctor's implementation framework. RESULTS: Safe & Together achieved high practitioner acceptability, with professionals reporting it resolved conflicts between their values and bureaucratic demands. Implementation successfully transformed professional language from mother-blaming to perpetrator pattern analysis and improved assessment quality. However, critical gaps were identified between assessment capabilities and intervention availability. Insufficient perpetrator programmes or children's therapeutic services existed to address identified needs. There was also no evidence of involvement of adult or child survivors in implementation of the intervention, despite "partnering" rhetoric. CONCLUSIONS: Safe & Together is necessary but insufficient for comprehensive transformation. While successfully shifting professional consciousness away from victim-blaming, the model cannot improve family outcomes without parallel investments in intervention infrastructure. The absence of family voices in both model development and implementation perpetuates professional-centric approaches even within anti-oppressive innovations. This "necessary but not sufficient" framework advances implementation science beyond binary success/failure assessments. Findings indicate that genuine transformation requires not only assessment innovation but also service infrastructure development and authentic co-production with families experiencing domestic violence and abuse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Abuse & Neglect
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2026.108223
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A necessary but not sufficient intervention: Implementing safe and together across Scottish and English sites

Laura Bellussi, Kelly Bracewell, John Devaney, Hannah Hale et al.
Child Abuse & Neglect
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

A necessary but not sufficient intervention: Implementing safe and together across Scottish and English sites

Laura Bellussi, Kelly Bracewell, John Devaney, Hannah Hale, Jane E. M. Callaghan
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Child welfare responses to domestic violence and abuse often blame mothers for "failing to protect" while ignoring perpetrators. The Safe & Together model promises transformation through perpetrator pattern-focused assessment. OBJECTIVE: To examine how S&T implementation translates into practice across diverse UK child welfare contexts. METHODS: Focus groups with 55 professionals across five Scottish and English sites were analyzed using Two-Stage Reflexive Implementation Analysis, integrating reflexive thematic analysis with Proctor's implementation framework. RESULTS: Safe & Together achieved high practitioner acceptability, with professionals reporting it resolved conflicts between their values and bureaucratic demands. Implementation successfully transformed professional language from mother-blaming to perpetrator pattern analysis and improved assessment quality. However, critical gaps were identified between assessment capabilities and intervention availability. Insufficient perpetrator programmes or children's therapeutic services existed to address identified needs. There was also no evidence of involvement of adult or child survivors in implementation of the intervention, despite "partnering" rhetoric. CONCLUSIONS: Safe & Together is necessary but insufficient for comprehensive transformation. While successfully shifting professional consciousness away from victim-blaming, the model cannot improve family outcomes without parallel investments in intervention infrastructure. The absence of family voices in both model development and implementation perpetuates professional-centric approaches even within anti-oppressive innovations. This "necessary but not sufficient" framework advances implementation science beyond binary success/failure assessments. Findings indicate that genuine transformation requires not only assessment innovation but also service infrastructure development and authentic co-production with families experiencing domestic violence and abuse.

Child Abuse & NeglectVol. 179
University of Stirling (GB), University of Lancashire (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.