Drug‐Coated Balloon‐Based Strategy for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease Across Complex and High‐Risk Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Risk Categories: A Multicenter Registry Study

BACKGROUND: Evidence regarding the risk-stratified effectiveness of drug-coated balloon (DCB)-based PCI for de novo coronary artery disease (CAD) remains limited, particularly in patients undergoing complex and high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP PCI). AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of DCB-based PCI versus DES-only PCI for de novo CAD across CHIP risk categories. METHODS: Patients treated with DCB alone or with a hybrid DCB/drug-eluting stent (DES) strategy between 2010 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed (DCB-based group). The comparator group included patients treated exclusively with second-generation DES from a Korean multicenter registry. The primary endpoint was the 2-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion thrombosis, and major bleeding. RESULTS: Total 2022 propensity score-matched pairs were stratified by CHIP score into low (0-2; 1660 pairs), intermediate (3-4; 304 pairs), and high (≥ 5; 91 pairs) risk groups. DCB-only treatment accounted for 70.8% of the DCB-based group, with hybrid approaches more frequent in higher-risk patients. Two-year MACE rates increased with CHIP risk in both groups, but remained consistently lower in the DCB-based group: 5.3%, 6.3%, and 20.0% versus 10.9%, 16.9%, and 31.2% for DES-only PCI (log-rank p < 0.001). DCB-based PCI was associated with lower MACE risk across all CHIP categories (all p < 0.05), with no significant interaction (p-interaction = 0.819). TVR reduction was significant in the low-to-intermediate risk (p-interaction = 0.056), and major bleeding declined with increasing CHIP risk, most notably in the high-risk group (p-interaction = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: DCB-based PCI was associated with significantly lower 2-year MACE rates across all CHIP risk categories and may offer a potential alternative to DES-only strategies in selective patients. Clinical trial registration number REAL-DCB registry (NCT04619277), PTRG-DES registry (NCT04734028).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70756
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drug‐Coated Balloon‐Based Strategy for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease Across Complex and High‐Risk Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Risk Categories: A Multicenter Registry Study

Sunwon Kim, Eun‐Seok Shin, Daewon Kang, Ae‐Young Her
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Drug‐Coated Balloon‐Based Strategy for De Novo Coronary Artery Disease Across Complex and High‐Risk Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Risk Categories: A Multicenter Registry Study

Sunwon Kim, Eun‐Seok Shin, Daewon Kang, Ae‐Young Her
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence regarding the risk-stratified effectiveness of drug-coated balloon (DCB)-based PCI for de novo coronary artery disease (CAD) remains limited, particularly in patients undergoing complex and high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP PCI). AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of DCB-based PCI versus DES-only PCI for de novo CAD across CHIP risk categories. METHODS: Patients treated with DCB alone or with a hybrid DCB/drug-eluting stent (DES) strategy between 2010 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed (DCB-based group). The comparator group included patients treated exclusively with second-generation DES from a Korean multicenter registry. The primary endpoint was the 2-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion thrombosis, and major bleeding. RESULTS: Total 2022 propensity score-matched pairs were stratified by CHIP score into low (0-2; 1660 pairs), intermediate (3-4; 304 pairs), and high (≥ 5; 91 pairs) risk groups. DCB-only treatment accounted for 70.8% of the DCB-based group, with hybrid approaches more frequent in higher-risk patients. Two-year MACE rates increased with CHIP risk in both groups, but remained consistently lower in the DCB-based group: 5.3%, 6.3%, and 20.0% versus 10.9%, 16.9%, and 31.2% for DES-only PCI (log-rank p < 0.001). DCB-based PCI was associated with lower MACE risk across all CHIP categories (all p < 0.05), with no significant interaction (p-interaction = 0.819). TVR reduction was significant in the low-to-intermediate risk (p-interaction = 0.056), and major bleeding declined with increasing CHIP risk, most notably in the high-risk group (p-interaction = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: DCB-based PCI was associated with significantly lower 2-year MACE rates across all CHIP risk categories and may offer a potential alternative to DES-only strategies in selective patients. Clinical trial registration number REAL-DCB registry (NCT04619277), PTRG-DES registry (NCT04734028).

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Kangwon National University (KR), Korea University Medical Center (KR), Ansan University (KR), Ulsan University Hospital (KR), Korea University (JP)
National Research Foundation, Korea University, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ulsan University Hospital
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.