Factors associated with chronic pain clinical decision support use in primary care

Clinical Decision Support (CDS), despite its potential to enhance healthcare quality, faces persistently low use. Prior research, often relying on self-reported data, has largely overlooked how clinician characteristics, such as gender and years in practice, moderate CDS use. We examined the moderating role of primary care clinician (PCC) characteristics on the relationship between patient-encounter characteristics and CDS use. We analyzed electronic health record data from a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (October 2019-May 2022) involving 69 PCCs with access to a CDS for managing chronic non-cancer pain (OneSheet). Our primary outcome was OneSheet use at a patient-encounter, defined as access within three days before or after an encounter. Independent variables included encounters for new patients, patients with chronic pain diagnoses, patients prescribed long-term opioid therapy (LTOT), and previous PCC OneSheet use. Generalized linear models with interaction terms tested PCC gender and years in practice as moderators. PCCs used OneSheet in 959 of 145,511 encounters (0.7%). Use was less likely for encounters with new patients (-0.42 percentage points (pp); 95% confidence interval (CI) [-0.65, -0.19]) but more likely for encounters with chronic pain diagnoses (3.48 pp; 95% CI [2.62, 4.33]) and patients prescribed LTOT (4.70 pp; 95% CI [3.57, 5.84]). Prior OneSheet use did not predict future use (0.30 pp; 95% CI [-0.00, 0.06]). Relationships were strongest among female PCCs with over 16 years of practice. Optimizing CDS use requires prioritizing clinical relevance and considering the diverse characteristics of clinicians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Digital Health
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001032
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors associated with chronic pain clinical decision support use in primary care

Lindsey Sanner, Olena Mazurenko, Emma McCord, Nate C. Apathy et al.
PLOS Digital Health
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Factors associated with chronic pain clinical decision support use in primary care

Lindsey Sanner, Olena Mazurenko, Emma McCord, Nate C. Apathy, A M Holmes, Christopher A. Harle, Justin Blackburn
article en

Abstract

Clinical Decision Support (CDS), despite its potential to enhance healthcare quality, faces persistently low use. Prior research, often relying on self-reported data, has largely overlooked how clinician characteristics, such as gender and years in practice, moderate CDS use. We examined the moderating role of primary care clinician (PCC) characteristics on the relationship between patient-encounter characteristics and CDS use. We analyzed electronic health record data from a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (October 2019-May 2022) involving 69 PCCs with access to a CDS for managing chronic non-cancer pain (OneSheet). Our primary outcome was OneSheet use at a patient-encounter, defined as access within three days before or after an encounter. Independent variables included encounters for new patients, patients with chronic pain diagnoses, patients prescribed long-term opioid therapy (LTOT), and previous PCC OneSheet use. Generalized linear models with interaction terms tested PCC gender and years in practice as moderators. PCCs used OneSheet in 959 of 145,511 encounters (0.7%). Use was less likely for encounters with new patients (-0.42 percentage points (pp); 95% confidence interval (CI) [-0.65, -0.19]) but more likely for encounters with chronic pain diagnoses (3.48 pp; 95% CI [2.62, 4.33]) and patients prescribed LTOT (4.70 pp; 95% CI [3.57, 5.84]). Prior OneSheet use did not predict future use (0.30 pp; 95% CI [-0.00, 0.06]). Relationships were strongest among female PCCs with over 16 years of practice. Optimizing CDS use requires prioritizing clinical relevance and considering the diverse characteristics of clinicians.

PLOS Digital HealthVol. 5(7)
Regenstrief Institute (US), Richard M. Fairbanks Foundation (US), Department of Health Services (US), Arkansas Department of Health (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Intramural Research Program
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.