Advances challenges and future directions of pretreatment strategies for enhancing biogas production from agricultural waste

The efficacy of biogas production from agricultural waste is largely determined by the pretreatment methods applied, which are pivotal in enhancing the conversion of organic matter into biofuel. Biogas production from agricultural waste offers a sustainable pathway for renewable energy. However, the recalcitrant lignocellulosic structure of many residues limits microbial accessibility and methane yield. This review synthesizes findings from 119 recent studies published between 2020 and 2026, providing quantitative benchmarking of physical, chemical, biological, and combined pretreatment techniques for agricultural residues. Each pretreatment method possesses distinct advantages and limitations. Physical pretreatments, like mechanical milling and steam explosion (TRL 7–9) achieve methane increases of 10–50% and suit large-scale, low-lignin feedstocks but demand high energy. For chemical methods, alkaline and organosolv (TRL 8–9 and 4–6) deliver 20–100% increases for lignin-rich biomass, yet risk digestate contamination through salt accumulation and inhibitor formation. Among biological pretreatments, ensiling and fungal treatment (TRL 7–9 and 5–7) provide 15–70% increases with low operating costs and positive digestate quality, though treatment times extend to days or weeks. Combined strategies generate synergistic effects: digestate recirculation achieves 86% operating expenditure savings, while ensiling reduces greenhouse gases by 250 Mg CO₂eq/1000 hectares, albeit with trade-offs including increased nitrogen leaching and soil carbon loss. Environmental hotspots are context dependent. Electricity driven physical methods burden grid carbon intensity, steam explosion risks methane slip (− 0,134 kg CO₂-eq/kWhₑₗ); and chemical pretreatments introduce salt accumulation unless lime recirculation is employed. Nanotechnology (TRL 3–5) is an emerging enhancement layer capable of improving direct interspecies electron transfer, but barriers in cost, toxicity, and regulation confine it to research applications. A decision framework integrating feedstock lignin content, plant scale, digestate quality, economic feasibility, and pretreatment limits is proposed. Advancing pretreatment methods is a cornerstone of the biogas cycle, essential for a sustainable circular energy future. Future research must prioritize region-specific, multi-feedstock studies, life cycle assessments, predictive modeling, and scalable hybrid systems that balance methane yield against sustainability. A significant need for integrated, standardised studies that are economically and environmentally sustainable and take into account the diversity of waste and the underlying microbial mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Green Chemistry
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44509-026-00022-2
Primary Topic
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advances challenges and future directions of pretreatment strategies for enhancing biogas production from agricultural waste

Junie Albine Kenfack Atangana, G. Paraschiv, Rufis Fregue Tiegam Tagne, S. Ş. Biriş et al.
Discover Green Chemistry
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
article

Advances challenges and future directions of pretreatment strategies for enhancing biogas production from agricultural waste

Junie Albine Kenfack Atangana, G. Paraschiv, Rufis Fregue Tiegam Tagne, S. Ş. Biriş, Cristina Ileana Covaliu Mierla, Gervais Kounou Ndongo
article en

Abstract

The efficacy of biogas production from agricultural waste is largely determined by the pretreatment methods applied, which are pivotal in enhancing the conversion of organic matter into biofuel. Biogas production from agricultural waste offers a sustainable pathway for renewable energy. However, the recalcitrant lignocellulosic structure of many residues limits microbial accessibility and methane yield. This review synthesizes findings from 119 recent studies published between 2020 and 2026, providing quantitative benchmarking of physical, chemical, biological, and combined pretreatment techniques for agricultural residues. Each pretreatment method possesses distinct advantages and limitations. Physical pretreatments, like mechanical milling and steam explosion (TRL 7–9) achieve methane increases of 10–50% and suit large-scale, low-lignin feedstocks but demand high energy. For chemical methods, alkaline and organosolv (TRL 8–9 and 4–6) deliver 20–100% increases for lignin-rich biomass, yet risk digestate contamination through salt accumulation and inhibitor formation. Among biological pretreatments, ensiling and fungal treatment (TRL 7–9 and 5–7) provide 15–70% increases with low operating costs and positive digestate quality, though treatment times extend to days or weeks. Combined strategies generate synergistic effects: digestate recirculation achieves 86% operating expenditure savings, while ensiling reduces greenhouse gases by 250 Mg CO₂eq/1000 hectares, albeit with trade-offs including increased nitrogen leaching and soil carbon loss. Environmental hotspots are context dependent. Electricity driven physical methods burden grid carbon intensity, steam explosion risks methane slip (− 0,134 kg CO₂-eq/kWhₑₗ); and chemical pretreatments introduce salt accumulation unless lime recirculation is employed. Nanotechnology (TRL 3–5) is an emerging enhancement layer capable of improving direct interspecies electron transfer, but barriers in cost, toxicity, and regulation confine it to research applications. A decision framework integrating feedstock lignin content, plant scale, digestate quality, economic feasibility, and pretreatment limits is proposed. Advancing pretreatment methods is a cornerstone of the biogas cycle, essential for a sustainable circular energy future. Future research must prioritize region-specific, multi-feedstock studies, life cycle assessments, predictive modeling, and scalable hybrid systems that balance methane yield against sustainability. A significant need for integrated, standardised studies that are economically and environmentally sustainable and take into account the diversity of waste and the underlying microbial mechanisms.

Discover Green ChemistryVol. 1(1)
Université de Yaoundé I (CM), University of Bucharest (RO), University of Rostock (DE), Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București (RO)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.