Perioperative outcomes in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome undergoing general anesthesia: a retrospective matched-pair study

BACKGROUND: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic multisystem disease characterized by profound fatigue, post-exertional malaise, cognitive impairment, and autonomic dysfunction. Despite features with potential relevance for anesthesia and perioperative care, empirical data on perioperative outcomes in patients with ME/CFS remains limited. We therefore performed a retrospective matched-pair analysis to generate clinical data on perioperative responses and identify areas for future research. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective matched-pair analysis at a single tertiary center. All patients with ME/CFS undergoing general anesthesia from 2015 to 2026 were identified using ICD-10-GM codes with additional manual verification and matched 1:1 to controls for comparison. Patients with confounding diagnoses or American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status above III were excluded. The analysis focused on intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, including baseline, post-induction, median, and lowest recorded systolic blood pressure and heart rate, as well as early postoperative outcomes in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), including maximum pain scores and requirement for rescue analgesia. RESULTS: Out of 189 individuals identified through ICD-10 codes, 15 matched pairs were included after application of exclusion criteria. Patients with ME/CFS exhibited lower minimum intraoperative systolic blood pressure (90.0 [82.5-95.0] vs. 100.0 [90.0-110.0] mmHg, p = 0.044) and lower minimum heart rate (50.0 [40.0-57.5] vs. 60.0 [50.0-65.0] bpm, p = 0.012). Vasopressor use and fluid administration did not differ, and no episodes of severe hypotension or perioperative adverse events were observed. Postoperative pain was higher in ME/CFS, with higher maximum pain scores (NRS 5.0 [4.0-6.0] vs. 1.0 [0.0-4.0], p = 0.008) and more frequent opioid rescue analgesia (80% vs. 33%, p = 0.039). Postoperative nausea or vomiting, oxygen supplementation, and PACU length of stay were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this small exploratory cohort, general anesthesia was not associated with clinically relevant hemodynamic instability in patients with ME/CFS. Postoperative pain scores and opioid rescue requirements were higher in the ME/CFS group. Post-exertional malaise, a key disease feature with potentially delayed onset and significant impact, was not captured and remains an important target for future research. These findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and support prospective studies evaluating perioperative management and patient-relevant outcomes in ME/CFS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-04102-5
Primary Topic
Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perioperative outcomes in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome undergoing general anesthesia: a retrospective matched-pair study

Christina Kaufmann, C.L. Lassen, V Kimmerling, Richard F. Kraus et al.
BMC Anesthesiology
Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
article

Perioperative outcomes in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome undergoing general anesthesia: a retrospective matched-pair study

Christina Kaufmann, C.L. Lassen, V Kimmerling, Richard F. Kraus, Bernhard Gräf, Alexander Dejaco, Elisabeth Schieffer, Felix Steinkirchner, Maximilian Käss
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic multisystem disease characterized by profound fatigue, post-exertional malaise, cognitive impairment, and autonomic dysfunction. Despite features with potential relevance for anesthesia and perioperative care, empirical data on perioperative outcomes in patients with ME/CFS remains limited. We therefore performed a retrospective matched-pair analysis to generate clinical data on perioperative responses and identify areas for future research. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective matched-pair analysis at a single tertiary center. All patients with ME/CFS undergoing general anesthesia from 2015 to 2026 were identified using ICD-10-GM codes with additional manual verification and matched 1:1 to controls for comparison. Patients with confounding diagnoses or American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status above III were excluded. The analysis focused on intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, including baseline, post-induction, median, and lowest recorded systolic blood pressure and heart rate, as well as early postoperative outcomes in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), including maximum pain scores and requirement for rescue analgesia. RESULTS: Out of 189 individuals identified through ICD-10 codes, 15 matched pairs were included after application of exclusion criteria. Patients with ME/CFS exhibited lower minimum intraoperative systolic blood pressure (90.0 [82.5-95.0] vs. 100.0 [90.0-110.0] mmHg, p = 0.044) and lower minimum heart rate (50.0 [40.0-57.5] vs. 60.0 [50.0-65.0] bpm, p = 0.012). Vasopressor use and fluid administration did not differ, and no episodes of severe hypotension or perioperative adverse events were observed. Postoperative pain was higher in ME/CFS, with higher maximum pain scores (NRS 5.0 [4.0-6.0] vs. 1.0 [0.0-4.0], p = 0.008) and more frequent opioid rescue analgesia (80% vs. 33%, p = 0.039). Postoperative nausea or vomiting, oxygen supplementation, and PACU length of stay were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this small exploratory cohort, general anesthesia was not associated with clinically relevant hemodynamic instability in patients with ME/CFS. Postoperative pain scores and opioid rescue requirements were higher in the ME/CFS group. Post-exertional malaise, a key disease feature with potentially delayed onset and significant impact, was not captured and remains an important target for future research. These findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and support prospective studies evaluating perioperative management and patient-relevant outcomes in ME/CFS.

BMC AnesthesiologyVol. 26(1)
Philipps University of Marburg (DE), Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE), University Hospital Regensburg (DE)
Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.