Law, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship

This article links law to two core elements of economic and social change: innovation (new ideas) and entrepreneurship (new ventures). It first maps the legal environment for innovation and entrepreneurship across multiple bodies of law and multiple modes of impact. It then synthesizes frameworks from sociolegal and organizational theory to examine ( a ) how legal fields translate ambiguous rules into institutionalized organizational practices and ( b ) how organizational fields evolve through punctuated cycles of innovation and entrepreneurship. The many analogies and linkages between these accounts suggest a broadly generalizable model of techno-legal regimes aligning, diverging, and realigning through loosely coupled cycles of incrementalism, discontinuity, ferment, and consolidation. The discussion closes by exploring coupling/decoupling mechanisms and sketching implications for practice, theory, and method. The thesis throughout is that law operates not as an exogenous constraint but as an endogenous, coevolving force within overlapping legal and industrial fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-042224-075155
Primary Topic
Business Law and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Law, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship

Mark C. Suchman
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Business Law and Ethics
article

Law, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship

Mark C. Suchman
article en

Abstract

This article links law to two core elements of economic and social change: innovation (new ideas) and entrepreneurship (new ventures). It first maps the legal environment for innovation and entrepreneurship across multiple bodies of law and multiple modes of impact. It then synthesizes frameworks from sociolegal and organizational theory to examine ( a ) how legal fields translate ambiguous rules into institutionalized organizational practices and ( b ) how organizational fields evolve through punctuated cycles of innovation and entrepreneurship. The many analogies and linkages between these accounts suggest a broadly generalizable model of techno-legal regimes aligning, diverging, and realigning through loosely coupled cycles of incrementalism, discontinuity, ferment, and consolidation. The discussion closes by exploring coupling/decoupling mechanisms and sketching implications for practice, theory, and method. The thesis throughout is that law operates not as an exogenous constraint but as an endogenous, coevolving force within overlapping legal and industrial fields.

Annual Review of Law and Social Science
American Bar Foundation (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Business Law and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.