Predictors of outcome of transarterial locoregional therapies in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter analysis

Abstract Objectives Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) is characterized by variable outcomes following embolization therapies. We aimed to identify predictors of survival and disease control (DC) in non-metastatic uHCC undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or radioembolization (TARE). Methods This multicenter, retrospective study reviewed patient, tumor, and treatment-related data; time-to-event median overall survival (mOS), and DC rates assessed by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) were collected over a median follow-up duration of 24 (IQR 11–42) months. Results Of 312 patients, 73.1 % were male, with a mean age of 67.1 ± 10.1 years; the majority were BCLC B (54.5 %), followed by 0/A (34.0 %) and locally advanced C (11.5 %). The mOS was longer in BCLC 0/A (47 months) than B (30 months) and C patients (22 months; p=0.0002). Patients treated with TACE had longer mOS of 43.0 months (95 % CI: 32.0–50.0) vs. 30.0 months (95 % CI: 19.0–32.0) for TARE (HR: 0.61, 95 % CI: 0.46–0.82; p=0.0011). Multivariable analyses revealed age (aHR: 0.97, 95 % CI: 0.94–0.99; p=0.015), beyond up-to-seven criteria (aHR: 2.21, 95 % CI: 1.17–4.17; p=0.014), BCLC stage (0/A vs. B; aHR: 2.20, 95 % CI: 1.27–3.83; p=0.005), post-intervention hepatic decompensation (aHR: 3.29, 95 % CI: 1.52–7.10; p=0.022), and treatment response (aHR: 2.78, 95 % CI: 1.30–5.94; p=0.008) as independent predictors of survival. TACE yielded higher complete response rates (33.5 % vs. 23.3 %; p=0.049), but similar DC (80.9 % vs. 76.7 %, p=0.567) to TARE. Predictors of DC included AFP level (≥400 ng/mL; aOR: 0.31, 95 % CI: 0.16–0.63; p=0.001) and BCLC stage (0/A vs. C, aOR: 0.20, 95 % CI: 0.08–0.53; p=0.001). Conclusions TACE achieved higher complete response rates but did not independently predict superior survival over TARE in uHCC patients. Patient-related factors rather than modality of intervention predicted treatment outcomes, underscoring their role in patient selection for embolization therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ONCOLOGIE
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/oncologie-2026-0081
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors of outcome of transarterial locoregional therapies in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter analysis

M. El Arabi, Faisal M. Sanai, Majed Almaghrabi, Jameel Bardesi et al.
ONCOLOGIE
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Predictors of outcome of transarterial locoregional therapies in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter analysis

M. El Arabi, Faisal M. Sanai, Majed Almaghrabi, Jameel Bardesi, Saad Aldosari, Adnan Alzanbagi, Mohamed Shawkat, Ali Albenmousa, Sarah S. Alfawaz, Hamdan S. Alghamdi, Saleh A. Alqahtani, Khalid I. Bzeizi, Hind Alyamani, Fatimah A. Albenmousa, Yaser Dahlan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) is characterized by variable outcomes following embolization therapies. We aimed to identify predictors of survival and disease control (DC) in non-metastatic uHCC undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or radioembolization (TARE). Methods This multicenter, retrospective study reviewed patient, tumor, and treatment-related data; time-to-event median overall survival (mOS), and DC rates assessed by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) were collected over a median follow-up duration of 24 (IQR 11–42) months. Results Of 312 patients, 73.1 % were male, with a mean age of 67.1 ± 10.1 years; the majority were BCLC B (54.5 %), followed by 0/A (34.0 %) and locally advanced C (11.5 %). The mOS was longer in BCLC 0/A (47 months) than B (30 months) and C patients (22 months; p=0.0002). Patients treated with TACE had longer mOS of 43.0 months (95 % CI: 32.0–50.0) vs. 30.0 months (95 % CI: 19.0–32.0) for TARE (HR: 0.61, 95 % CI: 0.46–0.82; p=0.0011). Multivariable analyses revealed age (aHR: 0.97, 95 % CI: 0.94–0.99; p=0.015), beyond up-to-seven criteria (aHR: 2.21, 95 % CI: 1.17–4.17; p=0.014), BCLC stage (0/A vs. B; aHR: 2.20, 95 % CI: 1.27–3.83; p=0.005), post-intervention hepatic decompensation (aHR: 3.29, 95 % CI: 1.52–7.10; p=0.022), and treatment response (aHR: 2.78, 95 % CI: 1.30–5.94; p=0.008) as independent predictors of survival. TACE yielded higher complete response rates (33.5 % vs. 23.3 %; p=0.049), but similar DC (80.9 % vs. 76.7 %, p=0.567) to TARE. Predictors of DC included AFP level (≥400 ng/mL; aOR: 0.31, 95 % CI: 0.16–0.63; p=0.001) and BCLC stage (0/A vs. C, aOR: 0.20, 95 % CI: 0.08–0.53; p=0.001). Conclusions TACE achieved higher complete response rates but did not independently predict superior survival over TARE in uHCC patients. Patient-related factors rather than modality of intervention predicted treatment outcomes, underscoring their role in patient selection for embolization therapies.

ONCOLOGIE
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA), Cornell University (US), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA), King Abdulaziz Medical City (SA), King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (SA), Riyadh Elm University (SA), University of Jeddah (SA), Saudi Center for Disease Prevention and Control (SA), King Abdullah Medical City (SA), National Guard Health Affairs (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.