Key equipment and technology imports and firm productivity

We exploit China’s 2007 policy promoting the import of key equipment and technology as an exogenous shock and examine its effects on firms’ total factor productivity (TFP). Drawing on a merged dataset combining the Chinese Annual Survey of Industrial Firms and patent filings for the 2003–2009 period, we implement a difference-in-differences strategy to quantify the policy’s impact. We find that the policy led to a statistically and economically significant 1.11% increase in treated firms’ TFP relative to untreated firms during the sample period, and this result remains highly robust across a wide range of empirical checks. A mechanism analysis reveals that the policy primarily relaxes firms’ financial constraints and strengthen their capacity for innovation, especially technological innovation. These mechanistic channels contribute to an observed improvement in productivity. Moreover, the heterogeneity analysis indicates that the productivity effects of the policy are greater among medium and large-sized firms, state-owned and foreign firms, non-superstar firms and firms in financially underdeveloped regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economics
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2026.2701302
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Key equipment and technology imports and firm productivity

Lingduo Jiang, Guofeng Zhang, Shuting Liu
Applied Economics
Global trade and economics
article

Key equipment and technology imports and firm productivity

Lingduo Jiang, Guofeng Zhang, Shuting Liu
article en

Abstract

We exploit China’s 2007 policy promoting the import of key equipment and technology as an exogenous shock and examine its effects on firms’ total factor productivity (TFP). Drawing on a merged dataset combining the Chinese Annual Survey of Industrial Firms and patent filings for the 2003–2009 period, we implement a difference-in-differences strategy to quantify the policy’s impact. We find that the policy led to a statistically and economically significant 1.11% increase in treated firms’ TFP relative to untreated firms during the sample period, and this result remains highly robust across a wide range of empirical checks. A mechanism analysis reveals that the policy primarily relaxes firms’ financial constraints and strengthen their capacity for innovation, especially technological innovation. These mechanistic channels contribute to an observed improvement in productivity. Moreover, the heterogeneity analysis indicates that the productivity effects of the policy are greater among medium and large-sized firms, state-owned and foreign firms, non-superstar firms and firms in financially underdeveloped regions.

Applied Economics
University of International Business and Economics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.