High socioeconomic status is associated with diverse consumption preferences across brands and price levels

Abstract Socioeconomic inequality shapes not only what people can afford but also how they engage with consumption as a social and cultural practice. Drawing on theories of conspicuous consumption, inconspicuous consumption, and cultural omnivorousness, we argue that lower economic constraints leave more room to diversify consumption behaviour along cultural and social aspects in the form of omnivorous or lifestyle-based niche consumption. Therefore, high socioeconomic status is associated with more diverse preferences for daily goods and services. We provide empirical evidence for this diversity hypothesis by analysing millions of mobile-tracked visits from thousands of Census Block Groups to thousands of branded stores in New York State. The results show that people living in high-income neighbourhoods visit a more diverse range of brands and price levels. The associations between diversity and income persist but are less prominent for necessities and for the densely populated and demographically diverse New York City. The associations replicate for education as an alternative measure of socioeconomic status and for the state of Texas. We further illustrate that the associations cannot be explained by simple geographic and demographic attributes, including the neighbourhoods’ demographic diversity and visitation volume, the residents’ geographic mobility, and the stores’ local availability, so deeper social and cultural factors must be at play.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-08258-w
Primary Topic
Social and Cultural Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High socioeconomic status is associated with diverse consumption preferences across brands and price levels

Yuanmo He, Milena Tsvetkova
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Social and Cultural Dynamics
article

High socioeconomic status is associated with diverse consumption preferences across brands and price levels

Yuanmo He, Milena Tsvetkova
article en

Abstract

Abstract Socioeconomic inequality shapes not only what people can afford but also how they engage with consumption as a social and cultural practice. Drawing on theories of conspicuous consumption, inconspicuous consumption, and cultural omnivorousness, we argue that lower economic constraints leave more room to diversify consumption behaviour along cultural and social aspects in the form of omnivorous or lifestyle-based niche consumption. Therefore, high socioeconomic status is associated with more diverse preferences for daily goods and services. We provide empirical evidence for this diversity hypothesis by analysing millions of mobile-tracked visits from thousands of Census Block Groups to thousands of branded stores in New York State. The results show that people living in high-income neighbourhoods visit a more diverse range of brands and price levels. The associations between diversity and income persist but are less prominent for necessities and for the densely populated and demographically diverse New York City. The associations replicate for education as an alternative measure of socioeconomic status and for the state of Texas. We further illustrate that the associations cannot be explained by simple geographic and demographic attributes, including the neighbourhoods’ demographic diversity and visitation volume, the residents’ geographic mobility, and the stores’ local availability, so deeper social and cultural factors must be at play.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social and Cultural Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.