Development of the Oral Care Attitude Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study

BACKGROUND: Oral care, a fundamental aspect of nursing, is crucial for maintaining patient health but is often neglected in healthcare settings. Despite existing studies on nurses' attitudes towards oral care, there is a significant gap in the literature regarding developing a valid and reliable tool to assess these attitudes effectively. OBJECTIVES: The research aims to create a valid and reliable measurement tool to evaluate attitudes towards oral care. METHODS: This methodological study was carried out with nurses working at Atatürk University Research Hospital. 'Introductory Information Form' and 'Oral Care Attitude Scale (OCAS)' were used to collect data. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the sub-dimensions of the scale ranged from 0.726 to 0.924, while the overall Cronbach's alpha value was 0.904. Exploratory factor analysis of the 21-item scale revealed a four-factor structure explaining 62.487% of the total variance. As a result of content validity, these factors were named 'Importance of Oral Care', 'Sustainability of Oral Care', 'Effectiveness of Oral Care' and 'Reluctance to Oral Care'. Confirmatory factor analysis using AMOS confirmed the four-factor structure with acceptable fit indices. CONCLUSIONS: The 'Oral Care Attitude Scale' is valid and reliable. Nurses' attitudes towards oral care can be assessed with this scale. According to the results obtained, the scale is expected to guide clinical practices or other studies to be conducted, raise the standards in patient care and increase awareness in this area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Dental Hygiene
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.70126
Primary Topic
Dental Health and Care Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the Oral Care Attitude Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study

Gülay İpekçoban, Asena Köse
International Journal of Dental Hygiene
Dental Health and Care Utilization
article

Development of the Oral Care Attitude Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study

Gülay İpekçoban, Asena Köse
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral care, a fundamental aspect of nursing, is crucial for maintaining patient health but is often neglected in healthcare settings. Despite existing studies on nurses' attitudes towards oral care, there is a significant gap in the literature regarding developing a valid and reliable tool to assess these attitudes effectively. OBJECTIVES: The research aims to create a valid and reliable measurement tool to evaluate attitudes towards oral care. METHODS: This methodological study was carried out with nurses working at Atatürk University Research Hospital. 'Introductory Information Form' and 'Oral Care Attitude Scale (OCAS)' were used to collect data. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the sub-dimensions of the scale ranged from 0.726 to 0.924, while the overall Cronbach's alpha value was 0.904. Exploratory factor analysis of the 21-item scale revealed a four-factor structure explaining 62.487% of the total variance. As a result of content validity, these factors were named 'Importance of Oral Care', 'Sustainability of Oral Care', 'Effectiveness of Oral Care' and 'Reluctance to Oral Care'. Confirmatory factor analysis using AMOS confirmed the four-factor structure with acceptable fit indices. CONCLUSIONS: The 'Oral Care Attitude Scale' is valid and reliable. Nurses' attitudes towards oral care can be assessed with this scale. According to the results obtained, the scale is expected to guide clinical practices or other studies to be conducted, raise the standards in patient care and increase awareness in this area.

International Journal of Dental Hygiene
Atatürk University (TR)
Atatürk Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dental Health and Care Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.