Cohort update: waves 2 and 3 of the global flourishing study

The global flourishing study is a longitudinal panel study designed to advance research on human flourishing across culturally and geographically diverse contexts. wave 1 included more than 200,000 adults from 21 countries and one territory, recruited to be approximately nationally representative of adult (18 +) populations. The initial cohort profile detailed the wave 1 sampling design and implementation. In this cohort profile update, we describe major developments since the original profile was published, including a mid-year retention survey, completion of wave 2 data collection, and inclusion of mainland China data. We summarize attrition patterns across countries, methodological refinements, and potential research applications. These include high variation in retention rates across countries, ranging from 90% in mainland China to 23.5% in Hong Kong, with an overall retention rate of 62%. The overall retention rate at wave 3 overall retention rate of 53.6%. Retention rates for Wave 3 range from 85.3% in mainland China to 12.9% in Hong Kong. The follow-up strategy of recontacting all Wave 1 participants led to the inclusion of ~ 14,000 who did not respond in Wave 2 but did respond in Wave 3. Key strengths of the global flourishing study include its multinational scope, longitudinal design, representative sampling, and open data access, while limitations include reliance on self-reports and variability in some aspects of the methodology across samples (e.g., differences in timing of data collection and weighting approaches). Key limitations of the global flourishing study include the variation and sometimes high attrition rates across some countries, heterogeneity in the length of time between waves, and potential survey mode effects. Beyond a continued commitment to open science, future directions of the global flourishing study include expanding to subsequent waves and the potential addition of new countries and item modules.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-026-01440-z
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cohort update: waves 2 and 3 of the global flourishing study

Byron R. Johnson, Zacc Ritter, Tyler J. VanderWeele, R. Noah Padgett et al.
European Journal of Epidemiology
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
article

Cohort update: waves 2 and 3 of the global flourishing study

Byron R. Johnson, Zacc Ritter, Tyler J. VanderWeele, R. Noah Padgett, Rajesh Srinivasan, Richard G. Cowden, Ying Han
article en

Abstract

The global flourishing study is a longitudinal panel study designed to advance research on human flourishing across culturally and geographically diverse contexts. wave 1 included more than 200,000 adults from 21 countries and one territory, recruited to be approximately nationally representative of adult (18 +) populations. The initial cohort profile detailed the wave 1 sampling design and implementation. In this cohort profile update, we describe major developments since the original profile was published, including a mid-year retention survey, completion of wave 2 data collection, and inclusion of mainland China data. We summarize attrition patterns across countries, methodological refinements, and potential research applications. These include high variation in retention rates across countries, ranging from 90% in mainland China to 23.5% in Hong Kong, with an overall retention rate of 62%. The overall retention rate at wave 3 overall retention rate of 53.6%. Retention rates for Wave 3 range from 85.3% in mainland China to 12.9% in Hong Kong. The follow-up strategy of recontacting all Wave 1 participants led to the inclusion of ~ 14,000 who did not respond in Wave 2 but did respond in Wave 3. Key strengths of the global flourishing study include its multinational scope, longitudinal design, representative sampling, and open data access, while limitations include reliance on self-reports and variability in some aspects of the methodology across samples (e.g., differences in timing of data collection and weighting approaches). Key limitations of the global flourishing study include the variation and sometimes high attrition rates across some countries, heterogeneity in the length of time between waves, and potential survey mode effects. Beyond a continued commitment to open science, future directions of the global flourishing study include expanding to subsequent waves and the potential addition of new countries and item modules.

European Journal of Epidemiology
Harvard University (US), Baylor University (US), University of St.Gallen (CH), Harvard University Press (US), Gallup Indian Medical Center (US)
John Templeton Foundation, Fetzer Institute, Templeton World Charity Foundation, Templeton Religion Trust
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.