Psychometric Evaluation of the English Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5–Child and Adolescent Version (CAPS-CA-5)

OBJECTIVE: Despite its widespread use for diagnosing and assessing the severity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among youth, psychometric evaluation of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for Children and Adolescents - DSM-5 (CAPS-CA-5) is limited to Portuguese- and Japanese-translated versions. Accordingly, the present study examined the reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility of the CAPS-CA-5 in an English-speaking, U.S. sample of trauma-exposed youth enrolled in the Texas Childhood Trauma Research Network (TX-CTRN). METHOD: A total of 3,134 trauma-exposed youth and young adults aged 8-20 completed an assessment battery in English comprising semi-structured diagnostic interviews and measures of acute stress symptoms, externalizing symptoms, depressive symptoms, resilience, and suicidality. The CAPS-CA-5 was administered at baseline and one-month follow-up. RESULTS: Consistent with the original CAPS-CA, internal consistency was adequate-to-strong for the total score and all subscales except Avoidance, and test-retest reliability was strong. The CAPS-CA-5 evidenced convergent validity with a positive PTSD screen on the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents and with acute stress symptoms. Externalizing symptoms, depressive symptoms, resilience, and suicidality all evidenced discriminant validity with the CAPS-CA-5. Cutoff scores were evaluated using Receiver Operating Curves and diagnostic utility was supported through the ability of the CAPS-CA-5 to differentiate categories of functional impairment, which varied by age and sex. CONCLUSIONS: This study, the first to provide psychometric support for the English version of the CAPS-CA-5 in a U.S. sample, contributes to a growing body of literature supporting the CAPS-CA-5 as a psychometrically valid PTSD interview across a range of nationalities and languages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2026.2697485
Primary Topic
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric Evaluation of the English Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5–Child and Adolescent Version (CAPS-CA-5)

Jeffrey D. Shahidullah, Wayne K. Goodman, David B. Riddle, Justin F. Rousseau et al.
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
article

Psychometric Evaluation of the English Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5–Child and Adolescent Version (CAPS-CA-5)

Jeffrey D. Shahidullah, Wayne K. Goodman, David B. Riddle, Justin F. Rousseau, Fei Teng, Cody G. Dodd, Charles B. Nemeroff, Erika S. Trent, Amy Garrett, Kevin M. Wagner, Israel Liberzon, Kendall N. Drummond, Amir Abu-Samaha, A. Castillo, Karen Dineen Wagner, Leslie K. Taylor, Leslie Proch, Nazan Aksan, Caitlin M. Pinciotti, Eric A. Storch, D. Jeffrey Newport
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite its widespread use for diagnosing and assessing the severity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among youth, psychometric evaluation of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for Children and Adolescents - DSM-5 (CAPS-CA-5) is limited to Portuguese- and Japanese-translated versions. Accordingly, the present study examined the reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility of the CAPS-CA-5 in an English-speaking, U.S. sample of trauma-exposed youth enrolled in the Texas Childhood Trauma Research Network (TX-CTRN). METHOD: A total of 3,134 trauma-exposed youth and young adults aged 8-20 completed an assessment battery in English comprising semi-structured diagnostic interviews and measures of acute stress symptoms, externalizing symptoms, depressive symptoms, resilience, and suicidality. The CAPS-CA-5 was administered at baseline and one-month follow-up. RESULTS: Consistent with the original CAPS-CA, internal consistency was adequate-to-strong for the total score and all subscales except Avoidance, and test-retest reliability was strong. The CAPS-CA-5 evidenced convergent validity with a positive PTSD screen on the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents and with acute stress symptoms. Externalizing symptoms, depressive symptoms, resilience, and suicidality all evidenced discriminant validity with the CAPS-CA-5. Cutoff scores were evaluated using Receiver Operating Curves and diagnostic utility was supported through the ability of the CAPS-CA-5 to differentiate categories of functional impairment, which varied by age and sex. CONCLUSIONS: This study, the first to provide psychometric support for the English version of the CAPS-CA-5 in a U.S. sample, contributes to a growing body of literature supporting the CAPS-CA-5 as a psychometrically valid PTSD interview across a range of nationalities and languages.

Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), University of North Texas (US), University of North Texas Health Science Center (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Texas A&M University System (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), John Peter Smith Hospital (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.