ECG-Based Assessment in Acute Heart Failure with Left Bundle Branch Block: Insights from a Retrospective Cohort

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) complicates electrocardiographic interpretation in acute heart failure (AHF). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between electrocardiographic parameters, including QRS duration, QRS morphology, and the Selvester QRS score (SQS), and echocardiographic findings in patients with AHF presenting with LBBB across different heart failure phenotypes. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort, 275 patients hospitalized with AHF and LBBB were analyzed. Patients were classified as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <40%), heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF, LVEF 40-49%), or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, LVEF ≥50%). Associations between electrocardiographic (ECG) and echocardiographic parameters were evaluated using Spearman correlation and multivariable regression. Discriminatory performance for reduced systolic function was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Mean age was 61.7±13.8 years and 70.5% were male; median LVEF was 40% (IQR 27-48%). HFrEF was present in 49.8%. Among ECG indices, only SQS correlated significantly with echocardiographic measures: LVEF (r=-0.447), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD, r=0.346), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD, r=0.373), and LV mass index (r=0.205) (all p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, SQS (OR=1.373, 95%CI 1.255-1.501, p<0.001) and LV mass index independently predicted HFrEF. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test confirmed adequate calibration (p=0.49). ROC analysis showed SQS had moderate discriminatory ability (area under the curve [AUC] 0.768, 95%CI 0.711-0.825), with an optimal cutoff >43 yielding 74.5% sensitivity and 69.6% specificity. QRS duration and morphology demonstrated no meaningful predictive value (AUC≈0.49). CONCLUSION: In AHF patients with LBBB, SQS outperforms conventional QRS metrics in identifying reduced LV systolic function. An SQS >43 provides moderate diagnostic accuracy and may support early risk stratification when echocardiography is not immediately available.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiology
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000553619
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ECG-Based Assessment in Acute Heart Failure with Left Bundle Branch Block: Insights from a Retrospective Cohort

Rıdvan Yurt, Cuma Süleymanoğlu, Veysi Can, Iskan Zengin et al.
Cardiology
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

ECG-Based Assessment in Acute Heart Failure with Left Bundle Branch Block: Insights from a Retrospective Cohort

Rıdvan Yurt, Cuma Süleymanoğlu, Veysi Can, Iskan Zengin, Fuat Polat
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) complicates electrocardiographic interpretation in acute heart failure (AHF). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between electrocardiographic parameters, including QRS duration, QRS morphology, and the Selvester QRS score (SQS), and echocardiographic findings in patients with AHF presenting with LBBB across different heart failure phenotypes. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort, 275 patients hospitalized with AHF and LBBB were analyzed. Patients were classified as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <40%), heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF, LVEF 40-49%), or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, LVEF ≥50%). Associations between electrocardiographic (ECG) and echocardiographic parameters were evaluated using Spearman correlation and multivariable regression. Discriminatory performance for reduced systolic function was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Mean age was 61.7±13.8 years and 70.5% were male; median LVEF was 40% (IQR 27-48%). HFrEF was present in 49.8%. Among ECG indices, only SQS correlated significantly with echocardiographic measures: LVEF (r=-0.447), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD, r=0.346), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD, r=0.373), and LV mass index (r=0.205) (all p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, SQS (OR=1.373, 95%CI 1.255-1.501, p<0.001) and LV mass index independently predicted HFrEF. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test confirmed adequate calibration (p=0.49). ROC analysis showed SQS had moderate discriminatory ability (area under the curve [AUC] 0.768, 95%CI 0.711-0.825), with an optimal cutoff >43 yielding 74.5% sensitivity and 69.6% specificity. QRS duration and morphology demonstrated no meaningful predictive value (AUC≈0.49). CONCLUSION: In AHF patients with LBBB, SQS outperforms conventional QRS metrics in identifying reduced LV systolic function. An SQS >43 provides moderate diagnostic accuracy and may support early risk stratification when echocardiography is not immediately available.

Cardiology
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.