3D Printing in Maxillofacial Tissue Regeneration: A Review

Introduction Three-dimensional bioprinting has changed tissue engineering in dentistry. It aids in creating precise tissue structures. This review focused on the developments in three- bioprinting for dental and maxillofacial tissue engineering. Methods This review examined previously published studies on bioprinting techniques used in dental and maxillofacial tissue engineering. Particular attention was given to the composition of bioinks, the types of cells employed, and the printing strategies used to fabricate tissue constructs. In addition, the available studies were evaluated to identify successful outcomes, existing limitations, and the major challenges associated with translating three-dimensional bioprinting into clinical practice. Results The findings highlight several commonly used bioinks, including gelatin methacrylate (GelMA), alginate, and collagen. These biomaterials are often combined with stem cells such as dental pulp stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells to support tissue regeneration. Recent advances in bioprinting techniques, particularly extrusion-based and inkjet printing, have enabled the fabrication of constructs with potential applications in pulp–dentin regeneration, alveolar bone repair, and oral mucosal reconstruction. Three-dimensional bioprinting allows the generation of highly precise tissue structures that more closely mimic the architecture of native tissues. Discussion Three-dimensional bioprinting shows considerable promise for future therapeutic applications in dentistry and maxillofacial reconstruction. This technology provides the ability to fabricate tissue constructs that replicate the structural and biological characteristics of native tissues Conclusion Continued research is required to optimize bioink formulations, improve printing accuracy, and facilitate the translation of three-dimensional bioprinting technologies into clinical practice for dental and maxillofacial tissue regeneration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Biomedical Engineering Journal
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2174/0118741207455653260714202537
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3D Printing in Maxillofacial Tissue Regeneration: A Review

Farzin Ahmadpour, Mahsa Karkhaneh, Mehdi Dehghan, Faramarz Dargahi Kourabbaslou et al.
The Open Biomedical Engineering Journal
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

3D Printing in Maxillofacial Tissue Regeneration: A Review

Farzin Ahmadpour, Mahsa Karkhaneh, Mehdi Dehghan, Faramarz Dargahi Kourabbaslou, Sina Sojoudi
article en

Abstract

Introduction Three-dimensional bioprinting has changed tissue engineering in dentistry. It aids in creating precise tissue structures. This review focused on the developments in three- bioprinting for dental and maxillofacial tissue engineering. Methods This review examined previously published studies on bioprinting techniques used in dental and maxillofacial tissue engineering. Particular attention was given to the composition of bioinks, the types of cells employed, and the printing strategies used to fabricate tissue constructs. In addition, the available studies were evaluated to identify successful outcomes, existing limitations, and the major challenges associated with translating three-dimensional bioprinting into clinical practice. Results The findings highlight several commonly used bioinks, including gelatin methacrylate (GelMA), alginate, and collagen. These biomaterials are often combined with stem cells such as dental pulp stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells to support tissue regeneration. Recent advances in bioprinting techniques, particularly extrusion-based and inkjet printing, have enabled the fabrication of constructs with potential applications in pulp–dentin regeneration, alveolar bone repair, and oral mucosal reconstruction. Three-dimensional bioprinting allows the generation of highly precise tissue structures that more closely mimic the architecture of native tissues. Discussion Three-dimensional bioprinting shows considerable promise for future therapeutic applications in dentistry and maxillofacial reconstruction. This technology provides the ability to fabricate tissue constructs that replicate the structural and biological characteristics of native tissues Conclusion Continued research is required to optimize bioink formulations, improve printing accuracy, and facilitate the translation of three-dimensional bioprinting technologies into clinical practice for dental and maxillofacial tissue regeneration.

The Open Biomedical Engineering JournalVol. 20(1)
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR), University of Tabriz (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.