Automated lesion tracking and treatment response classification on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT across PPP, RECIP 1.0 and TLW frameworks

PURPOSE: Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT against expert reference matches and to evaluate its integration into three PSMA-specific treatment response frameworks-the Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA PET/CT (RECIP 1.0), PSMA PET Progression (PPP) criteria, and the Traffic Light Workflow (TLW)-in men with biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans from 132 BCR PCa patients were analysed using a registration-based pipeline that automatically assigned one-to-one lesion correspondences. Lesions were labelled as corresponding (CL), disappearing (DL) or new (NL). Algorithm-derived RECIP 1.0, PPP, and TLW categories were compared with expert reference labels and tested for overall survival (OS) association using univariable Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 1,066 lesions were identified (559 baseline, 507 follow-up), including 371 CLs, 188 DLs, and 136 NLs, yielding 695 matching decisions. The lesion matching algorithm achieved 95.1% matching accuracy. Lesion mismatches were associated with poorer registration quality. Algorithm-derived patient-level response classifications showed high concordance with ground-truth frameworks, with classification accuracy of 95.5% for RECIP 1.0, 96.2% for PPP, and 96.2% for TLW. All frameworks retained prognostic significance for OS, with progressive disease conferring hazard ratios (HR) of-RECIP 1.0 HR = 2.57 (95% CI 1.33-4.98), PPP HR = 2.02 (95% CI 1.04-3.90), and TLW HR = 2.29 (95% CI 1.22-4.28). CONCLUSION: The automated lesion-tracking algorithm reproduced expert matches with high accuracy and preserved the prognostic utility of RECIP 1.0, PPP, and TLW in a BCR cohort, supporting its use as a reproducible lesion-matching method for quantitative response assessment on PSMA PET/CT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN ACTRN12615000608561. Registered 11 June 2015. Retrospectively registered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-026-08071-2
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated lesion tracking and treatment response classification on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT across PPP, RECIP 1.0 and TLW frameworks

Jake Kendrick, Martin A. Ebert, Theo Lucas, Kaylee Molin et al.
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Automated lesion tracking and treatment response classification on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT across PPP, RECIP 1.0 and TLW frameworks

Jake Kendrick, Martin A. Ebert, Theo Lucas, Kaylee Molin, Mikaela Dell’Oro, Jeremy S. L. Ong
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT against expert reference matches and to evaluate its integration into three PSMA-specific treatment response frameworks-the Response Evaluation Criteria in PSMA PET/CT (RECIP 1.0), PSMA PET Progression (PPP) criteria, and the Traffic Light Workflow (TLW)-in men with biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans from 132 BCR PCa patients were analysed using a registration-based pipeline that automatically assigned one-to-one lesion correspondences. Lesions were labelled as corresponding (CL), disappearing (DL) or new (NL). Algorithm-derived RECIP 1.0, PPP, and TLW categories were compared with expert reference labels and tested for overall survival (OS) association using univariable Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 1,066 lesions were identified (559 baseline, 507 follow-up), including 371 CLs, 188 DLs, and 136 NLs, yielding 695 matching decisions. The lesion matching algorithm achieved 95.1% matching accuracy. Lesion mismatches were associated with poorer registration quality. Algorithm-derived patient-level response classifications showed high concordance with ground-truth frameworks, with classification accuracy of 95.5% for RECIP 1.0, 96.2% for PPP, and 96.2% for TLW. All frameworks retained prognostic significance for OS, with progressive disease conferring hazard ratios (HR) of-RECIP 1.0 HR = 2.57 (95% CI 1.33-4.98), PPP HR = 2.02 (95% CI 1.04-3.90), and TLW HR = 2.29 (95% CI 1.22-4.28). CONCLUSION: The automated lesion-tracking algorithm reproduced expert matches with high accuracy and preserved the prognostic utility of RECIP 1.0, PPP, and TLW in a BCR cohort, supporting its use as a reproducible lesion-matching method for quantitative response assessment on PSMA PET/CT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN ACTRN12615000608561. Registered 11 June 2015. Retrospectively registered.

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
The University of Western Australia (AU), Fiona Stanley Hospital (AU), Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (AU), Centre for Cancer Biology (AU)
University of Western Australia
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.