Benchmarking User-Centered Design in Academic Library Websites: A Comparative Analysis

This study evaluates the user interface (UI) design quality of 60 university library websites across the United States through systematic content analysis of homepage effectiveness. A mixed-method approach is used for combining quantitative scoring and expert panel review. The research investigated four defined criteria: information architecture, navigation structure, discovery search box placement, and overall interface design quality. Findings reveal substantial variation in homepage design, with only 25% of libraries achieving satisfactory or excellent ratings (70%–60% composite score). Common deficiencies were identified: text-heavy layouts observed in 45% of the sample, inconsistent navigation structures 38%, and poor search box visibility (32%). Libraries demonstrated superior design characteristics: clear information hierarchies, prominent placement of the discovery search box, consistent navigation conventions, and strategic use of white space. The study reveals a persistent gap between user-centered design principles and actual implementation practices in academic libraries. Findings provide an evidence-based evaluation framework for academic library websites and offer actionable recommendations for interface enhancement. This research contributes to the growing literature on digital library services and human-computer interaction in higher education, focusing on how effective user-interface design is central to serving as a digital gateway for academic libraries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Library Administration
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2026.2686758
Primary Topic
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking User-Centered Design in Academic Library Websites: A Comparative Analysis

Mohammad Aslam
Journal of Library Administration
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
article

Benchmarking User-Centered Design in Academic Library Websites: A Comparative Analysis

Mohammad Aslam
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the user interface (UI) design quality of 60 university library websites across the United States through systematic content analysis of homepage effectiveness. A mixed-method approach is used for combining quantitative scoring and expert panel review. The research investigated four defined criteria: information architecture, navigation structure, discovery search box placement, and overall interface design quality. Findings reveal substantial variation in homepage design, with only 25% of libraries achieving satisfactory or excellent ratings (70%–60% composite score). Common deficiencies were identified: text-heavy layouts observed in 45% of the sample, inconsistent navigation structures 38%, and poor search box visibility (32%). Libraries demonstrated superior design characteristics: clear information hierarchies, prominent placement of the discovery search box, consistent navigation conventions, and strategic use of white space. The study reveals a persistent gap between user-centered design principles and actual implementation practices in academic libraries. Findings provide an evidence-based evaluation framework for academic library websites and offer actionable recommendations for interface enhancement. This research contributes to the growing literature on digital library services and human-computer interaction in higher education, focusing on how effective user-interface design is central to serving as a digital gateway for academic libraries.

Journal of Library Administration
A.T. Still University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.