Sacred Text, Human Choices: An Ethics of Difference for Bible Translation

This article explores an ethics of difference for Bible translation, drawing on Lawrence Venuti’s work. I contrast the instrumental view, which conceptualizes translation as neutral meaning transfer, with the contextual view, which recognizes translation as interpretive and culturally embedded, involving both representation and transformation. I advocate for the contextual paradigm. Through examples from biblical texts, such as Hebrew אֱמוּנָה “faithfulness” and Greek πίστις “faith,” I demonstrate how translation choices reflect cultural and theological frameworks. I therefore propose viewing Bible translations as cultural testimonies: unique articulations of God’s revelation within specific cultural contexts. This challenges the historical dominance of European Bibles and calls for greater appreciation of diversity among Bible translations. An ethics of difference requires transparency about operative frames, accountability for translation choices, and critical awareness of power dynamics. Finally, the contextual view reveals a problem with AI-based drafts: Human translators must remain primary decision-makers in this deeply interpretive, culturally embedded task.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Bible Translator
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20516770261456189
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sacred Text, Human Choices: An Ethics of Difference for Bible Translation

Matthijs de Jong
The Bible Translator
Translation Studies and Practices
article

Sacred Text, Human Choices: An Ethics of Difference for Bible Translation

Matthijs de Jong
article en

Abstract

This article explores an ethics of difference for Bible translation, drawing on Lawrence Venuti’s work. I contrast the instrumental view, which conceptualizes translation as neutral meaning transfer, with the contextual view, which recognizes translation as interpretive and culturally embedded, involving both representation and transformation. I advocate for the contextual paradigm. Through examples from biblical texts, such as Hebrew אֱמוּנָה “faithfulness” and Greek πίστις “faith,” I demonstrate how translation choices reflect cultural and theological frameworks. I therefore propose viewing Bible translations as cultural testimonies: unique articulations of God’s revelation within specific cultural contexts. This challenges the historical dominance of European Bibles and calls for greater appreciation of diversity among Bible translations. An ethics of difference requires transparency about operative frames, accountability for translation choices, and critical awareness of power dynamics. Finally, the contextual view reveals a problem with AI-based drafts: Human translators must remain primary decision-makers in this deeply interpretive, culturally embedded task.

The Bible Translator
Protestant Theological University (NL), Korean Bible Society (KR), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.