Integrating semi-automated radiographic analysis and biomarkers for detecting knee osteoarthritis: cross-sectional study in Central Java, Indonesia

Abstract Background Radiographic determination of Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) in knee osteoarthritis (OA) has limitation in providing accurate and consistent results. Therefore, improved methods utilizing the automated measurement and biomarkers in detecting knee OA in the early stages is necessary. Objectives This study examines the differences in the results between semi-automatic and manual measurement and correlation of biomarkers (IL-6, COMP, and CTX-II) to the severity of knee osteoarthritis. Methods The research employed a cross-sectional study involving 126 patients, for whom semi-automated radiographs of the right and left AP weight-bearing knee projections were performed and evaluated using semi-automatic and manual assessment. A digital assessment used MATLAB software to calculate the area and compared it with the manual. Biomarkers were obtained from blood serum for COMP and IL-6, and from urine for CTX-II. Differences between groups were analyzed using Wilcoxon or T -tests, while the Spearman correlation test and linear regression test examined the relationship between the severities of OA based on KL Grades and biomarkers. Results The area of osteophyte and TFA was no different ( p > 0.005). ( p < 0.001) between manual and semi-automated measurement while especially on JSW and eminence assessment showed significant different. The grade I and II knee OA threshold is a medial JSW = 4.95 mm; Lateral JSW = 5.35 mm; osteophyte area = 10.6 mm 2 ; eminence = 8.75 mm. The higher levels of COMP, CTX-II, and IL-6 have increased the severity of knee OA. The relationship is positive, and the strength of the relationship is moderate at CTX-II ( r = 0.546, CI 0.37–0.68), and IL-6 ( r = 0.465 CI 0.27–0.62). For COMP, the relationship is positive and weak ( r = 0.360, CI 0.15–0.54). The grade I-II knee osteoarthritis severity threshold is IL-6 of 2.14 pg/mL, COMP of 696.5 ng/mL, and CTX-II of 260.5 ng/mL. Conclusion Automatic assessment can detect initial knee OA (KL grades I and II). Biomarkers (IL-6, COMP, and CTX-II) can potentially detect knee OA in early stages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-026-01813-0
Primary Topic
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating semi-automated radiographic analysis and biomarkers for detecting knee osteoarthritis: cross-sectional study in Central Java, Indonesia

Hermina Sukmaningtyas, Wahyu Setya Budi, Kartika Afrida Fauzia, Ika Saptarini et al.
The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
article

Integrating semi-automated radiographic analysis and biomarkers for detecting knee osteoarthritis: cross-sectional study in Central Java, Indonesia

Hermina Sukmaningtyas, Wahyu Setya Budi, Kartika Afrida Fauzia, Ika Saptarini, Fatimah Fatimah, Sugiyanto Sugiyanto, Harimat Hendarwan, Julaeha Julaeha
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Radiographic determination of Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) in knee osteoarthritis (OA) has limitation in providing accurate and consistent results. Therefore, improved methods utilizing the automated measurement and biomarkers in detecting knee OA in the early stages is necessary. Objectives This study examines the differences in the results between semi-automatic and manual measurement and correlation of biomarkers (IL-6, COMP, and CTX-II) to the severity of knee osteoarthritis. Methods The research employed a cross-sectional study involving 126 patients, for whom semi-automated radiographs of the right and left AP weight-bearing knee projections were performed and evaluated using semi-automatic and manual assessment. A digital assessment used MATLAB software to calculate the area and compared it with the manual. Biomarkers were obtained from blood serum for COMP and IL-6, and from urine for CTX-II. Differences between groups were analyzed using Wilcoxon or T -tests, while the Spearman correlation test and linear regression test examined the relationship between the severities of OA based on KL Grades and biomarkers. Results The area of osteophyte and TFA was no different ( p > 0.005). ( p < 0.001) between manual and semi-automated measurement while especially on JSW and eminence assessment showed significant different. The grade I and II knee OA threshold is a medial JSW = 4.95 mm; Lateral JSW = 5.35 mm; osteophyte area = 10.6 mm 2 ; eminence = 8.75 mm. The higher levels of COMP, CTX-II, and IL-6 have increased the severity of knee OA. The relationship is positive, and the strength of the relationship is moderate at CTX-II ( r = 0.546, CI 0.37–0.68), and IL-6 ( r = 0.465 CI 0.27–0.62). For COMP, the relationship is positive and weak ( r = 0.360, CI 0.15–0.54). The grade I-II knee osteoarthritis severity threshold is IL-6 of 2.14 pg/mL, COMP of 696.5 ng/mL, and CTX-II of 260.5 ng/mL. Conclusion Automatic assessment can detect initial knee OA (KL grades I and II). Biomarkers (IL-6, COMP, and CTX-II) can potentially detect knee OA in early stages.

The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineVol. 57(1)
Diponegoro University (ID), State University of Semarang (ID), National Research, Development and Innovation Office (HU), Universitas Semarang (ID)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.