Passive revolution: A contested concept and a research agenda

The articles in this volume show that “passive revolution” is a type of social transformation distinct from other paths. In countries ranging from Mexico and South Africa to Trinidad and Tobago and Iran, revolution was thoroughly integrated with restoration. This happened through absorbing the cadres, policies, and language of radical challengers into existing structures of domination. The authors do not entirely align on how this process is linked to other key concepts of the Gramscian paradigm, such as hegemony, civil society, and war of position. However, their divergences attest to the robustness of the paradigm. After clarifying the theoretical stakes and discussing the cases, this essay further specifies how passive revolution is distinct from revolution, counter-revolution, radical reform, and revolution from above. It also states the need to integrate Gramsci with Arrighi, Fanon, and CLR James. The essay ends with providing more details regarding the research agenda that ensues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205261469127
Primary Topic
Political theory and Gramsci
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Passive revolution: A contested concept and a research agenda

Cihan Tuğal
Critical Sociology
Political theory and Gramsci
article

Passive revolution: A contested concept and a research agenda

Cihan Tuğal
article en

Abstract

The articles in this volume show that “passive revolution” is a type of social transformation distinct from other paths. In countries ranging from Mexico and South Africa to Trinidad and Tobago and Iran, revolution was thoroughly integrated with restoration. This happened through absorbing the cadres, policies, and language of radical challengers into existing structures of domination. The authors do not entirely align on how this process is linked to other key concepts of the Gramscian paradigm, such as hegemony, civil society, and war of position. However, their divergences attest to the robustness of the paradigm. After clarifying the theoretical stakes and discussing the cases, this essay further specifies how passive revolution is distinct from revolution, counter-revolution, radical reform, and revolution from above. It also states the need to integrate Gramsci with Arrighi, Fanon, and CLR James. The essay ends with providing more details regarding the research agenda that ensues.

Critical Sociology
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Political theory and Gramsci
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.