Success factors for cultivating situated learning in projects

Purpose The implementation of situated learning (SL) in project-based settings is hindered by a lack of empirical research on its success factors (SFs). This paper addresses this gap by investigating the SFs for cultivating SL in construction projects, with the aim of providing insights into effective implementation strategies. Design/methodology/approach Purposive sampling method was utilized to obtain a sample size of 203 respondents and data solicited through a structured questionnaire survey. The data set was analyzed using a four-level analytical protocol. These include – pretesting the data set, mean score ranking, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and fuzzy synthetic evaluation (FSE). Findings Fuzzy synthetic evaluation revealed that SFs at the team level had the highest criticality index (4.292), followed by organizational-level (4.202) and individual-level factors (4.193), all exceeding the 3.50 threshold. Although individual-level factors explained the greatest variance (22.587%), team dynamics were perceived as most decisive for SL outcomes. Mean ranking identified participatory decision-making (M = 4.47), ease of information flow (M = 4.45), team composition (M = 4.44), team leadership (M = 4.43) and behavioral conditioning (M = 4.35) as the top five critical SFs. The results indicate that team-level factors constitute the primary mechanism for cultivating SL, supported by organizational enablers and individual capacities. Originality/value This study provides the first empirical validation of SFs for cultivating situated learning in projects, addressing a gap in literature dominated by cognitive knowledge management models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Built Environment Project and Asset Management
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-01-2026-0001
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Success factors for cultivating situated learning in projects

Francis Lanme Guribie, David John Edwards, De‐Graft Owusu‐Manu, Edward Badu
Built Environment Project and Asset Management
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

Success factors for cultivating situated learning in projects

Francis Lanme Guribie, David John Edwards, De‐Graft Owusu‐Manu, Edward Badu
article en

Abstract

Purpose The implementation of situated learning (SL) in project-based settings is hindered by a lack of empirical research on its success factors (SFs). This paper addresses this gap by investigating the SFs for cultivating SL in construction projects, with the aim of providing insights into effective implementation strategies. Design/methodology/approach Purposive sampling method was utilized to obtain a sample size of 203 respondents and data solicited through a structured questionnaire survey. The data set was analyzed using a four-level analytical protocol. These include – pretesting the data set, mean score ranking, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and fuzzy synthetic evaluation (FSE). Findings Fuzzy synthetic evaluation revealed that SFs at the team level had the highest criticality index (4.292), followed by organizational-level (4.202) and individual-level factors (4.193), all exceeding the 3.50 threshold. Although individual-level factors explained the greatest variance (22.587%), team dynamics were perceived as most decisive for SL outcomes. Mean ranking identified participatory decision-making (M = 4.47), ease of information flow (M = 4.45), team composition (M = 4.44), team leadership (M = 4.43) and behavioral conditioning (M = 4.35) as the top five critical SFs. The results indicate that team-level factors constitute the primary mechanism for cultivating SL, supported by organizational enablers and individual capacities. Originality/value This study provides the first empirical validation of SFs for cultivating situated learning in projects, addressing a gap in literature dominated by cognitive knowledge management models.

Built Environment Project and Asset Management
Birmingham City University (GB), University of Johannesburg (ZA), Tamale Teaching Hospital (GH), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH), Kwame Nkrumah University (ZM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.