Transcatheter Versus Mechanical and Bioprosthetic Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Retrospective Patient Cohorts with Aortic Stenosis <75 Years

Background: Comparisons between transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement (TAVR or SAVR) in younger aortic stenosis (AS) patients are scarce. The aim of the study was to evaluate the 5-year outcomes of AS patients <75 years undergoing TAVR or SAVR. Methods: This was a single-center study that retrospectively included AS patients <75 years who underwent transfemoral TAVR or SAVR from a Chinese real-world database (2014–2023). The primary outcome was defined as the composite of all-cause death, stroke, and cardiovascular rehospitalization at 5 years post-procedure. Robust risk adjustment was performed using inverse probability weighting (IPTW), multilevel regression models, and competing-risk analysis. Sensitivity analyses included comparison between TAVR and mechanical or bioprosthetic SAVR separately in the overall cohort and patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Results: A total of 1646 patients undergoing TAVR (n = 808) or SAVR (n = 838) were finally included. At baseline, TAVR patients had an older age [(67.9 ± 5.2) vs. (56.5 ± 9.6) years, p < 0.001] and a higher surgical risk score [(3.1 ± 1.5) vs. (2.1 ± 1.0) %, p < 0.001] than SAVR patients, which was well balanced after IPTW. The 5-year adjusted risk of the primary outcome was similar (TAVR 45.9% vs. SAVR 43.4%, weighted hazard ratio, 1.00, 95% confidence interval, 0.64–1.54, p = 0.986), which stayed comparable between TAVR and mechanical or bioprosthetic SAVR separately. In BAV patients (n = 516), the risk of death was 8.3% in the TAVR group and 3.4% in the SAVR group (p = 0.349). The risk of bioprosthetic structural valve deterioration at 5 years was comparable between groups in the overall cohort (5.7% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.478) and BAV patients (7.8% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.345). Conclusions: In this retrospective study of patients aged <75 years, the risk-adjusted 5-year major clinical outcomes were statistically similar between TAVR and SAVR. However, given the inherent historical imbalances, these exploratory findings should be interpreted with caution, and dedicated prospective studies are still needed in younger and BAV populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15145574
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transcatheter Versus Mechanical and Bioprosthetic Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Retrospective Patient Cohorts with Aortic Stenosis <75 Years

欧袁伟翔, Xin Wei, Yong Peng, Lijun Zeng et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Transcatheter Versus Mechanical and Bioprosthetic Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Retrospective Patient Cohorts with Aortic Stenosis <75 Years

欧袁伟翔, Xin Wei, Yong Peng, Lijun Zeng, Xi Zhang, Mao Chen, X H Wang, Ole De Backer, Wei Meng, Yuan Feng
article en

Abstract

Background: Comparisons between transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement (TAVR or SAVR) in younger aortic stenosis (AS) patients are scarce. The aim of the study was to evaluate the 5-year outcomes of AS patients &lt;75 years undergoing TAVR or SAVR. Methods: This was a single-center study that retrospectively included AS patients &lt;75 years who underwent transfemoral TAVR or SAVR from a Chinese real-world database (2014–2023). The primary outcome was defined as the composite of all-cause death, stroke, and cardiovascular rehospitalization at 5 years post-procedure. Robust risk adjustment was performed using inverse probability weighting (IPTW), multilevel regression models, and competing-risk analysis. Sensitivity analyses included comparison between TAVR and mechanical or bioprosthetic SAVR separately in the overall cohort and patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Results: A total of 1646 patients undergoing TAVR (n = 808) or SAVR (n = 838) were finally included. At baseline, TAVR patients had an older age [(67.9 ± 5.2) vs. (56.5 ± 9.6) years, p &lt; 0.001] and a higher surgical risk score [(3.1 ± 1.5) vs. (2.1 ± 1.0) %, p &lt; 0.001] than SAVR patients, which was well balanced after IPTW. The 5-year adjusted risk of the primary outcome was similar (TAVR 45.9% vs. SAVR 43.4%, weighted hazard ratio, 1.00, 95% confidence interval, 0.64–1.54, p = 0.986), which stayed comparable between TAVR and mechanical or bioprosthetic SAVR separately. In BAV patients (n = 516), the risk of death was 8.3% in the TAVR group and 3.4% in the SAVR group (p = 0.349). The risk of bioprosthetic structural valve deterioration at 5 years was comparable between groups in the overall cohort (5.7% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.478) and BAV patients (7.8% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.345). Conclusions: In this retrospective study of patients aged &lt;75 years, the risk-adjusted 5-year major clinical outcomes were statistically similar between TAVR and SAVR. However, given the inherent historical imbalances, these exploratory findings should be interpreted with caution, and dedicated prospective studies are still needed in younger and BAV populations.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(14)
Sichuan University (CN), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University (CN), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN), Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Sichuan Province (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Sichuan University, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.