Three-Year Follow-Up of the Randomized Trial Comparing Open Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Non-Curable Stage IV Colon Cancer (JCOG1107)

BACKGROUND: JCOG1107 (UMIN-CTR, number UMIN000009715) was a non-inferiority phase III trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for symptomatic, non-curable stage IV colon cancer. The primary analysis confirmed the non-inferiority of laparoscopic surgery in terms of progression-free survival. OBJECTIVE: To compare long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for stage IV colon cancer. DESIGN: Multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled phase III trial. SETTING: Forty-two Japanese institutions. PATIENTS: Participants were considered eligible if they had pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma with a primary tumor between the cecum and rectosigmoid, presenting with stenosis and/or bleeding, and one to three non-curable factors. The required sample size was 194 to ensure 70% power, a one-sided alpha of 5%, and a non-inferiority hazard ratio margin of 1.38. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either open or laparoscopic primary tumor resection, followed by modified FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin with bevacizumab. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients were randomized, including 95 open and 100 laparoscopic surgeries. Postoperative chemotherapy was given to 82 and 86 patients, respectively. The median follow-up period for all randomized patients was 24.4 months. Grade ≥3 late complications occurred in one open (1.1%) and two laparoscopic (2.0%) patients. Three-year progression-free survival was 5.3% (95% confidence interval: 2.0-11.0) for open surgery and 3.0% (0.8-7.8) for laparoscopic surgery (hazard ratio: 1.028; 95% confidence interval: 0.772-1.370; p for non-inferiority = 0.02). The three-year overall survival was 31.5% (22.5-41.0) and 28.5% (20.0-37.6) (hazard ratio: 1.048; 95% confidence interval: 0.780-1.410), respectively. LIMITATIONS: Chemotherapy was administered without knowledge of microsatellite instability or RAS/BRAF mutation status. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery is non-inferior to open surgery for non-curable stage IV colon cancer and should be considered an acceptable surgical option. See Video Abstract.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000004373
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three-Year Follow-Up of the Randomized Trial Comparing Open Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Non-Curable Stage IV Colon Cancer (JCOG1107)

Masazumi Okajima, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Junki Mizusawa, Takumi Hasegawa et al.
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Three-Year Follow-Up of the Randomized Trial Comparing Open Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Non-Curable Stage IV Colon Cancer (JCOG1107)

Masazumi Okajima, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Junki Mizusawa, Takumi Hasegawa, Shunsuke Tsukamoto, Toshifumi Yamaguchi, Masafumi Inomata, M. Ito, Riku Kajikawa, Jun Watanabe, Tomonori Akagi, Hiroshi Katayama, Satoshi Ikeda, Akio Shiomi, Atsushi Takashima
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: JCOG1107 (UMIN-CTR, number UMIN000009715) was a non-inferiority phase III trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for symptomatic, non-curable stage IV colon cancer. The primary analysis confirmed the non-inferiority of laparoscopic surgery in terms of progression-free survival. OBJECTIVE: To compare long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for stage IV colon cancer. DESIGN: Multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled phase III trial. SETTING: Forty-two Japanese institutions. PATIENTS: Participants were considered eligible if they had pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma with a primary tumor between the cecum and rectosigmoid, presenting with stenosis and/or bleeding, and one to three non-curable factors. The required sample size was 194 to ensure 70% power, a one-sided alpha of 5%, and a non-inferiority hazard ratio margin of 1.38. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either open or laparoscopic primary tumor resection, followed by modified FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin with bevacizumab. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients were randomized, including 95 open and 100 laparoscopic surgeries. Postoperative chemotherapy was given to 82 and 86 patients, respectively. The median follow-up period for all randomized patients was 24.4 months. Grade ≥3 late complications occurred in one open (1.1%) and two laparoscopic (2.0%) patients. Three-year progression-free survival was 5.3% (95% confidence interval: 2.0-11.0) for open surgery and 3.0% (0.8-7.8) for laparoscopic surgery (hazard ratio: 1.028; 95% confidence interval: 0.772-1.370; p for non-inferiority = 0.02). The three-year overall survival was 31.5% (22.5-41.0) and 28.5% (20.0-37.6) (hazard ratio: 1.048; 95% confidence interval: 0.780-1.410), respectively. LIMITATIONS: Chemotherapy was administered without knowledge of microsatellite instability or RAS/BRAF mutation status. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery is non-inferior to open surgery for non-curable stage IV colon cancer and should be considered an acceptable surgical option. See Video Abstract.

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
Oita University (JP), Yokohama City University Medical Center (JP), Shizuoka Cancer Center (JP), Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital (JP), Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital (JP), National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP), Tokyo National Hospital (JP), Yokohama City University (JP), Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.