Improving ecological indicators of mangrove canopy height and aboveground biomass through multi-source data fusion on the Amazon coast

Reliable ecological indicators of mangrove structure and carbon storage are essential for monitoring coastal ecosystem conditions, yet their accuracy remains uncertain in tall, structurally heterogeneous forests, where Earth observation products differ in sensor physics, spatial resolution, and acquisition dates. Here, we present a multi-scale framework to evaluate, calibrate, and improve two widely used ecological indicators of mangrove condition—canopy height and aboveground biomass (AGB)—across approximately 7000 ha of mangroves in the Marapanim estuary, northern Brazil. The framework integrates UAV photogrammetry, radar-derived digital elevation models (TanDEM-X and SRTM), and field measurements to quantify cross-scale discrepancies and identify the main sources of uncertainty affecting indicator retrieval. High-resolution UAV canopy-height models revealed exceptionally tall Avicennia forests reaching up to 53 m, among the tallest mangroves reported globally. At the local scale, mean AGB reached approximately 648 Mg ha −1 in the southern Avicennia -dominated sector and 430 Mg ha −1 in the northern mixed Rhizophora–Avicennia sector, with local maxima of ∼800 Mg ha −1 . In contrast, radar-derived products yielded substantially lower estimates of canopy height and biomass, with height differences of 8–10 m in tall and structurally heterogeneous stands. These discrepancies reflect the combined effects of sensor-dependent canopy representation, spatial averaging, and temporal mismatch between historical radar acquisitions and recent UAV observations. To improve the ecological interpretation of these products, we implemented a calibration strategy linking field and UAV measurements to satellite observations and complemented it with UAV-based three-dimensional volumetric reconstruction of individual trees as an independent structural check on allometric biomass estimates. Our results show that canopy height and AGB derived from coarse-resolution radar products can systematically underestimate mangrove structural condition and carbon storage in tall forests unless locally calibrated. Beyond documenting exceptionally tall and carbon-dense Amazonian mangroves, this study provides a transferable framework for evaluating and improving ecological indicators of forest structure and biomass in complex coastal ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115200
Primary Topic
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving ecological indicators of mangrove canopy height and aboveground biomass through multi-source data fusion on the Amazon coast

Junghyung Ryu, Sergio P. Nunes, Evandro A.S. Magalhães, Angee C.C. Burgos et al.
Ecological Indicators
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
article

Improving ecological indicators of mangrove canopy height and aboveground biomass through multi-source data fusion on the Amazon coast

Junghyung Ryu, Sergio P. Nunes, Evandro A.S. Magalhães, Angee C.C. Burgos, Bettina Bozi, Marcelo C.L. Cohen, Luiz C.R. Pessenda
article en

Abstract

Reliable ecological indicators of mangrove structure and carbon storage are essential for monitoring coastal ecosystem conditions, yet their accuracy remains uncertain in tall, structurally heterogeneous forests, where Earth observation products differ in sensor physics, spatial resolution, and acquisition dates. Here, we present a multi-scale framework to evaluate, calibrate, and improve two widely used ecological indicators of mangrove condition—canopy height and aboveground biomass (AGB)—across approximately 7000 ha of mangroves in the Marapanim estuary, northern Brazil. The framework integrates UAV photogrammetry, radar-derived digital elevation models (TanDEM-X and SRTM), and field measurements to quantify cross-scale discrepancies and identify the main sources of uncertainty affecting indicator retrieval. High-resolution UAV canopy-height models revealed exceptionally tall Avicennia forests reaching up to 53 m, among the tallest mangroves reported globally. At the local scale, mean AGB reached approximately 648 Mg ha −1 in the southern Avicennia -dominated sector and 430 Mg ha −1 in the northern mixed Rhizophora–Avicennia sector, with local maxima of ∼800 Mg ha −1 . In contrast, radar-derived products yielded substantially lower estimates of canopy height and biomass, with height differences of 8–10 m in tall and structurally heterogeneous stands. These discrepancies reflect the combined effects of sensor-dependent canopy representation, spatial averaging, and temporal mismatch between historical radar acquisitions and recent UAV observations. To improve the ecological interpretation of these products, we implemented a calibration strategy linking field and UAV measurements to satellite observations and complemented it with UAV-based three-dimensional volumetric reconstruction of individual trees as an independent structural check on allometric biomass estimates. Our results show that canopy height and AGB derived from coarse-resolution radar products can systematically underestimate mangrove structural condition and carbon storage in tall forests unless locally calibrated. Beyond documenting exceptionally tall and carbon-dense Amazonian mangroves, this study provides a transferable framework for evaluating and improving ecological indicators of forest structure and biomass in complex coastal ecosystems.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 189
Louisiana State University (US), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Federal do Pará (BR), Pukyong National University (KR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, National Research Foundation of Korea
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.