Fracture‐mechanical numerical simulation of punching in reinforced concrete foundations considering soil‐structure interaction and design code evaluation

Abstract Current design provisions for punching shear in foundations, including Eurocode 2 (2023) and fib Model Code 2020, are mechanically based models partly calibrated against experimental data from isolated flat slabs and foundation specimens. The available experimental database for foundations is small and only partly representative of realistic dimensions and soil‐structure interaction. Thick footings and raft foundations develop very high punching capacities that often exceed laboratory load limits, and many studies rely on scaled specimens or simplified soil representations. To address these limitations, validated nonlinear fracture‐mechanical finite element simulations are performed, accounting for soil‐structure interaction. A systematic parametric study comprising 190 simulations investigates the influence of shear slenderness, slab thickness, concrete strength, reinforcement ratio and soil stiffness on punching resistance. The results show that these parameters interact strongly and are not consistently represented in current design provisions. Comparison with EC2:2023 and MC2020 indicates overall good agreement, but also significant parameter‐dependent deviations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Concrete
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70714
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fracture‐mechanical numerical simulation of punching in reinforced concrete foundations considering soil‐structure interaction and design code evaluation

Yolcu Sever, Dirk Schlicke
Structural Concrete
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
article

Fracture‐mechanical numerical simulation of punching in reinforced concrete foundations considering soil‐structure interaction and design code evaluation

Yolcu Sever, Dirk Schlicke
article en

Abstract

Abstract Current design provisions for punching shear in foundations, including Eurocode 2 (2023) and fib Model Code 2020, are mechanically based models partly calibrated against experimental data from isolated flat slabs and foundation specimens. The available experimental database for foundations is small and only partly representative of realistic dimensions and soil‐structure interaction. Thick footings and raft foundations develop very high punching capacities that often exceed laboratory load limits, and many studies rely on scaled specimens or simplified soil representations. To address these limitations, validated nonlinear fracture‐mechanical finite element simulations are performed, accounting for soil‐structure interaction. A systematic parametric study comprising 190 simulations investigates the influence of shear slenderness, slab thickness, concrete strength, reinforcement ratio and soil stiffness on punching resistance. The results show that these parameters interact strongly and are not consistently represented in current design provisions. Comparison with EC2:2023 and MC2020 indicates overall good agreement, but also significant parameter‐dependent deviations.

Structural Concrete
Graz University of Technology (AT)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.