A critical analysis of different electron donors in methanogenic methanation: Thermodynamics, kinetics, and economic feasibility

The rising concerns about climate change highlight the need for integrated energy systems that reduce CO 2 emissions and produce renewable fuels. CO 2 biomethanation offers a promising pathway by converting captured CO 2 into energy dense biomethane; however, the relative performance of different electron donors in practice remains insufficiently understood. In particular, systematic comparisons of gaseous, liquid, and solid-phase electron donors with respect to energy efficiency, reaction kinetics, surface driven behaviors, and economic feasibility are lacking. This study addresses this gap through a comprehensive, phase-resolved evaluation of electron donors for CO 2 biomethanation under mesophilic conditions, integrating thermodynamic performance, kinetic accessibility, surface reactivity, and cost considerations. Among gaseous electron donors, hydrogen (H 2 ) proved most favorable, combining high exergetic efficiency 88.31% with effective gas-liquid mass transfer, whereas hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) exhibited significant exergy losses. Liquid-phase electron donors (LPEDs) showed superior overall energetic performance such as acetate achieved the highest exergetic efficiency 93.49% and energy recovery, while formate demonstrated the most favorable kinetics and bioavailability under substrate-limited conditions. Although butyric acid yielded the highest CH 4 production, diffusional limitations reduced its overall effectiveness. Solid-phase electron donors (SPEDs) displayed distinct behavior, with CH 4 formation governed by surface-mediated H 2 release. Zerovalent iron (ZVI) exhibited the highest surface-normalized H 2 production and CH 4 potential, followed by zinc. Cost-normalized analysis revealed, acetate and formate as the most economically competitive donors, with pyrite and aluminum emerged as promising SPEDs for long term, low maintenance biomethanation systems. Overall, this study provides a rational, phase-integrated framework for scalable electron donor selection for CO 2 biomethanation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of CO2 Utilization
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2026.103512
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A critical analysis of different electron donors in methanogenic methanation: Thermodynamics, kinetics, and economic feasibility

Bo‐Zhong Mu, Prof. Dr. Mohsin Kazmi, Chaudhry Haider Ali, Ghulam Dastgir et al.
Journal of CO2 Utilization
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
article

A critical analysis of different electron donors in methanogenic methanation: Thermodynamics, kinetics, and economic feasibility

Bo‐Zhong Mu, Prof. Dr. Mohsin Kazmi, Chaudhry Haider Ali, Ghulam Dastgir, Y Liu, Muhammad Javed, Muhammad Irfan, Ji-Dong Gu, Lei Zhou
article en

Abstract

The rising concerns about climate change highlight the need for integrated energy systems that reduce CO 2 emissions and produce renewable fuels. CO 2 biomethanation offers a promising pathway by converting captured CO 2 into energy dense biomethane; however, the relative performance of different electron donors in practice remains insufficiently understood. In particular, systematic comparisons of gaseous, liquid, and solid-phase electron donors with respect to energy efficiency, reaction kinetics, surface driven behaviors, and economic feasibility are lacking. This study addresses this gap through a comprehensive, phase-resolved evaluation of electron donors for CO 2 biomethanation under mesophilic conditions, integrating thermodynamic performance, kinetic accessibility, surface reactivity, and cost considerations. Among gaseous electron donors, hydrogen (H 2 ) proved most favorable, combining high exergetic efficiency 88.31% with effective gas-liquid mass transfer, whereas hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) exhibited significant exergy losses. Liquid-phase electron donors (LPEDs) showed superior overall energetic performance such as acetate achieved the highest exergetic efficiency 93.49% and energy recovery, while formate demonstrated the most favorable kinetics and bioavailability under substrate-limited conditions. Although butyric acid yielded the highest CH 4 production, diffusional limitations reduced its overall effectiveness. Solid-phase electron donors (SPEDs) displayed distinct behavior, with CH 4 formation governed by surface-mediated H 2 release. Zerovalent iron (ZVI) exhibited the highest surface-normalized H 2 production and CH 4 potential, followed by zinc. Cost-normalized analysis revealed, acetate and formate as the most economically competitive donors, with pyrite and aluminum emerged as promising SPEDs for long term, low maintenance biomethanation systems. Overall, this study provides a rational, phase-integrated framework for scalable electron donor selection for CO 2 biomethanation.

Journal of CO2 UtilizationVol. 111
University of Engineering and Technology Lahore (PK), East China University of Science and Technology (CN), Guangdong Technion-Israel Institute of Technology (CN)
Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.