International consensus on intestinal epithelial barrier assessment and therapeutic effects in inflammatory bowel diseases clinical trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Restoration of intestinal barrier integrity and function in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been associated not only with a reduced burden of persistent symptoms but also with improved long-term outcomes, prompting growing interest in intestinal barrier healing as a potential new therapeutic target. To date, no clinical trials have specifically evaluated therapies aimed at restoring intestinal barrier function in IBD, and there is currently no consensus on how such trials should be designed or how the intestinal barrier should be assessed. The aim of this initiative was to develop consensus recommendations on the optimal design of clinical trials and the selection of tools to evaluate therapies targeting the intestinal barrier in IBD. METHODS: A panel of 12 international specialists with recognised expertise in the intestinal barrier and/or IBD clinical trials evaluated statements developed from a systematic literature review. Statements were discussed and anonymously voted on using a modified Delphi methodology. Consensus was predefined as at least 75% agreement among participants. The study was conducted and reported in accordance with the Conducting and REporting of DElphi Studies framework. RESULTS: Fourteen statements reached consensus and were approved. These statements addressed key aspects of clinical trial design, including the role of intestinal barrier assessment as an endpoint, timing of reassessment, protocol requirements and disease-specific considerations. Additional statements focused on the selection and standardisation of tools for intestinal barrier assessment, encompassing imaging-based techniques, functional permeability assays and endogenous biomarkers, as well as considerations for implementation and future research directions. CONCLUSIONS: This international consensus provides a structured framework to guide the design of future clinical trials evaluating efficacies of therapies in restoring intestinal barrier integrity and/or function in IBD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gut
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2026-339056
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International consensus on intestinal epithelial barrier assessment and therapeutic effects in inflammatory bowel diseases clinical trials

Vipul Jairath, Olivier Dewit, Sandra Citi, Sebastian Zeißig et al.
Gut
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

International consensus on intestinal epithelial barrier assessment and therapeutic effects in inflammatory bowel diseases clinical trials

Vipul Jairath, Olivier Dewit, Sandra Citi, Sebastian Zeißig, Markus F. Neurath, Pauline Rivière, Raja Atreya, Matthias Friedrich, Sophie Vieujean, Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet, Andrea Buda, Timo Räth, Arthur Kaser, Nicolas Pierre, Mathilde Pohin, Marietta Iacucci, Marjorie Argollo, SP Travis, Subrata Ghosh, Rupert Leong
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Restoration of intestinal barrier integrity and function in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been associated not only with a reduced burden of persistent symptoms but also with improved long-term outcomes, prompting growing interest in intestinal barrier healing as a potential new therapeutic target. To date, no clinical trials have specifically evaluated therapies aimed at restoring intestinal barrier function in IBD, and there is currently no consensus on how such trials should be designed or how the intestinal barrier should be assessed. The aim of this initiative was to develop consensus recommendations on the optimal design of clinical trials and the selection of tools to evaluate therapies targeting the intestinal barrier in IBD. METHODS: A panel of 12 international specialists with recognised expertise in the intestinal barrier and/or IBD clinical trials evaluated statements developed from a systematic literature review. Statements were discussed and anonymously voted on using a modified Delphi methodology. Consensus was predefined as at least 75% agreement among participants. The study was conducted and reported in accordance with the Conducting and REporting of DElphi Studies framework. RESULTS: Fourteen statements reached consensus and were approved. These statements addressed key aspects of clinical trial design, including the role of intestinal barrier assessment as an endpoint, timing of reassessment, protocol requirements and disease-specific considerations. Additional statements focused on the selection and standardisation of tools for intestinal barrier assessment, encompassing imaging-based techniques, functional permeability assays and endogenous biomarkers, as well as considerations for implementation and future research directions. CONCLUSIONS: This international consensus provides a structured framework to guide the design of future clinical trials evaluating efficacies of therapies in restoring intestinal barrier integrity and/or function in IBD.

Gut
University of Geneva (CH), Western University (CA), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE), Université de Bordeaux (FR), University of Liège (BE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), University of Cambridge (GB), University College Cork (IE), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT), APC Microbiome Institute (IE), Oxford BioMedica (United Kingdom) (GB), Northwestern Medicine (US), Hospital of Prato (IT), Macquarie University (AU)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.