Self-Knowing Animals: a constitutivist account of self-knowledge for rational minds

This paper articulates and defends a constitutivist account of self-knowledge for rational minds. It is a built-in feature of such states in rational human animals that they are always potentially self-conscious and so potentially self-knowable in explicit reflective consciousness. But independently of whether one explicitly reflects on some mental state or other, such states are always implicitly or unreflectively known. For a rational mind to undergo a mental state is to undergo an essentially knowable condition, because rational minds are self-consciously constituted. In Section 2, I explicate constitutivism by laying out its main philosophical commitments. In Section 3, I elaborate the crucial role of implicit self-knowledge in a constitutive account (as a ‘built-in’ feature of mental states) by critically engaging with Matthew Boyle’s recent account of reflective self-knowledge and pre-reflective self-awareness. In Section 4, I address the worry that a constitutivist account of self-knowledge must have a restricted scope because it cannot explain knowledge of phenomenal states.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Explorations
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2026.2703503
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-Knowing Animals: a constitutivist account of self-knowledge for rational minds

Evan Jones
Philosophical Explorations
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

Self-Knowing Animals: a constitutivist account of self-knowledge for rational minds

Evan Jones
article en

Abstract

This paper articulates and defends a constitutivist account of self-knowledge for rational minds. It is a built-in feature of such states in rational human animals that they are always potentially self-conscious and so potentially self-knowable in explicit reflective consciousness. But independently of whether one explicitly reflects on some mental state or other, such states are always implicitly or unreflectively known. For a rational mind to undergo a mental state is to undergo an essentially knowable condition, because rational minds are self-consciously constituted. In Section 2, I explicate constitutivism by laying out its main philosophical commitments. In Section 3, I elaborate the crucial role of implicit self-knowledge in a constitutive account (as a ‘built-in’ feature of mental states) by critically engaging with Matthew Boyle’s recent account of reflective self-knowledge and pre-reflective self-awareness. In Section 4, I address the worry that a constitutivist account of self-knowledge must have a restricted scope because it cannot explain knowledge of phenomenal states.

Philosophical Explorations
Florida State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.