Direct probabilistic IMPT treatment planning with setup and range errors for neuro-oncological patients

Abstract Objective . To show computational feasibility of a previously proposed probabilistic planning approach on a neuro-oncological patient group, we compared probabilistic plans with (automated) robust plans for one patient (group A) that could achieve sufficient clinical target coverage and for four patients (group B) where target coverage had to be compromised due to organ-at-risk (OAR) dose constraints. Approach . The probabilistic approach is percentile-based and uses the fact that a (dose) percentile can be approximated as a linear combination of its expected value and standard deviation. This allows us to formulate objectives and constraints with patient-specific acceptance probabilities. The optimization has a nested structure: the inner optimization optimizes the beam weights for a given percentile estimate, while an outer loop iteratively updates and improves the accuracy of the percentile estimate. For every outer iteration, the optimization is warm-started from the previous iteration. Percentiles are efficiently calculated by sampling a polynomial chaos expansion of the dose-influence matrix. Main results . The patient in group A achieved cumulative OAR dose reductions (of OAR-related DVH-metrics) of 23.1 GyRBE, for identical target coverage. Target coverage improved for all patients in group B (the 10th percentile of D 99.8 % increased up to 0.61 GyRBE), at the same time reaching cumulative OAR dose reductions (of OAR-related DVH-metrics) up to about 40 GyRBE. Probabilistic plans were optimized in 44 h to 226 h. For two representative patients, eliminating warm-starting (i.e. the outer loop) from the approach reduced total optimization times to below 10 h (which took originally 80 h and 141 h). Significance . Compared to robust optimization methods, the probabilistic approach achieves improved trade-offs between probabilistic target coverage and OAR sparing, potentially leading to better treatments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aeb08b
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Direct probabilistic IMPT treatment planning with setup and range errors for neuro-oncological patients

Steven Habraken, Zoltán Perkó, Danny Lathouwers, Mischa S. Hoogeman et al.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Direct probabilistic IMPT treatment planning with setup and range errors for neuro-oncological patients

Steven Habraken, Zoltán Perkó, Danny Lathouwers, Mischa S. Hoogeman, Sebastiaan Breedveld, Jenneke I. de Jong, Jelte R. de Jong
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective . To show computational feasibility of a previously proposed probabilistic planning approach on a neuro-oncological patient group, we compared probabilistic plans with (automated) robust plans for one patient (group A) that could achieve sufficient clinical target coverage and for four patients (group B) where target coverage had to be compromised due to organ-at-risk (OAR) dose constraints. Approach . The probabilistic approach is percentile-based and uses the fact that a (dose) percentile can be approximated as a linear combination of its expected value and standard deviation. This allows us to formulate objectives and constraints with patient-specific acceptance probabilities. The optimization has a nested structure: the inner optimization optimizes the beam weights for a given percentile estimate, while an outer loop iteratively updates and improves the accuracy of the percentile estimate. For every outer iteration, the optimization is warm-started from the previous iteration. Percentiles are efficiently calculated by sampling a polynomial chaos expansion of the dose-influence matrix. Main results . The patient in group A achieved cumulative OAR dose reductions (of OAR-related DVH-metrics) of 23.1 GyRBE, for identical target coverage. Target coverage improved for all patients in group B (the 10th percentile of D 99.8 % increased up to 0.61 GyRBE), at the same time reaching cumulative OAR dose reductions (of OAR-related DVH-metrics) up to about 40 GyRBE. Probabilistic plans were optimized in 44 h to 226 h. For two representative patients, eliminating warm-starting (i.e. the outer loop) from the approach reduced total optimization times to below 10 h (which took originally 80 h and 141 h). Significance . Compared to robust optimization methods, the probabilistic approach achieves improved trade-offs between probabilistic target coverage and OAR sparing, potentially leading to better treatments.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 71(20)
University of Medical Sciences and Technology (SD), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), Proton Therapy Centre (CZ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.