Leakage-Controlled and Survey-Weighted Machine Learning for Neonatal Mortality Risk Prediction Using NFHS-5 Data

Background: Neonatal mortality remains uneven across Indian states, while prediction studies using survey data are often limited by class imbalance, data leakage, inadequate calibration, and insufficient consideration of complex survey design. This study developed and rigorously evaluated survey-aware machine-learning models for neonatal mortality risk prediction using NFHS-5 data. Methods: Data from 33,338 children in Bihar, Chhattisgarh, and Uttarakhand were analysed. Household-grouped development/test splitting, repeated grouped nested cross-validation, DHS sampling weights, fold-contained preprocessing, socioeconomic clustering, particle swarm optimisation, resampling, and out-of-fold feature augmentation were applied. Logistic regression, random forest, histogram gradient boosting (HGB), and artificial neural networks were compared using PR-AUC as the primary metric. Calibration, household-bootstrap confidence intervals, decision-curve analysis, prediction timepoint analysis, and leave-one-state-out validation were performed. Results: HGB achieved the highest repeated cross-validation PR-AUC (0.189) and ROC-AUC (0.778). On the untouched test set, ROC-AUC was 0.755 (95% CI 0.718–0.796), and PR-AUC was 0.202 (0.138–0.267), with sensitivity 0.813, specificity 0.517, PPV 0.063, and NPV 0.989. Clustering, PSO, SMOTE, and augmentation added little value. Antenatal performance was weaker, and state-wise transportability varied. Conclusions: Survey-weighted HGB provided the strongest predictive performance, but low PPV and heterogeneous state-level results restrict its use to low-cost screening. Prospective validation is required before deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14142144
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leakage-Controlled and Survey-Weighted Machine Learning for Neonatal Mortality Risk Prediction Using NFHS-5 Data

Raja Hashim Ali, M. Mukherjee, Talha Ali Khan
Healthcare
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

Leakage-Controlled and Survey-Weighted Machine Learning for Neonatal Mortality Risk Prediction Using NFHS-5 Data

Raja Hashim Ali, M. Mukherjee, Talha Ali Khan
article en

Abstract

Background: Neonatal mortality remains uneven across Indian states, while prediction studies using survey data are often limited by class imbalance, data leakage, inadequate calibration, and insufficient consideration of complex survey design. This study developed and rigorously evaluated survey-aware machine-learning models for neonatal mortality risk prediction using NFHS-5 data. Methods: Data from 33,338 children in Bihar, Chhattisgarh, and Uttarakhand were analysed. Household-grouped development/test splitting, repeated grouped nested cross-validation, DHS sampling weights, fold-contained preprocessing, socioeconomic clustering, particle swarm optimisation, resampling, and out-of-fold feature augmentation were applied. Logistic regression, random forest, histogram gradient boosting (HGB), and artificial neural networks were compared using PR-AUC as the primary metric. Calibration, household-bootstrap confidence intervals, decision-curve analysis, prediction timepoint analysis, and leave-one-state-out validation were performed. Results: HGB achieved the highest repeated cross-validation PR-AUC (0.189) and ROC-AUC (0.778). On the untouched test set, ROC-AUC was 0.755 (95% CI 0.718–0.796), and PR-AUC was 0.202 (0.138–0.267), with sensitivity 0.813, specificity 0.517, PPV 0.063, and NPV 0.989. Clustering, PSO, SMOTE, and augmentation added little value. Antenatal performance was weaker, and state-wise transportability varied. Conclusions: Survey-weighted HGB provided the strongest predictive performance, but low PPV and heterogeneous state-level results restrict its use to low-cost screening. Prospective validation is required before deployment.

HealthcareVol. 14(14)
University of Potsdam (DE), University of Applied Sciences Potsdam (DE), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.