Mental Health Nurses' Responses to Consumers' Experiences of Safewards in Acute Inpatient Mental Health Units: A Qualitative Exploratory Study

INTRODUCTION: Safewards effectively reduces restrictive practices within acute inpatient mental health units. Consumers' experiences of Safewards impact on broader experiences within these settings. Given the influence mental health nurses have on consumers' experiences, nurses' responses to these experiences require further exploration. AIM: To explore the responses of mental health nurses to consumers' experiences of Safewards within acute inpatient mental health units. METHODS: A qualitative exploratory method was used for this study, involving semi-structured focus groups with mental health nurses from two acute inpatient mental health units. Participants were asked to respond to a summary of themes about consumers' experiences of Safewards. RESULTS: Thematic analysis uncovered three themes: (1) Prioritising respectful communication and investing time with consumers; (2) Relating Safewards to everyday work with consumers; (3) Safewards and its impact on restrictive practices. DISCUSSION: Participants acknowledged consumers' experiences of Safewards and their frustrations when mental health nurses were unavailable. Some participants expressed uncertainty about the suitability of Safewards, despite consumers' endorsement, highlighting a possible discrepancy between mental health nurses' and consumers' views. Most participants perceived Safewards to be effective but inconsistently applied, in part due to varying acceptance and understanding of Safewards. LIMITATIONS: Differences between the units may not be captured in combined data analyses and other views about the consumers' experiences of Safewards may not be represented. Researcher bias may have influenced the way in which data were collected, analysed and reported. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Safewards requires partnership between mental health nurses and consumers, and a more nuanced understanding of its application within an acute inpatient mental health setting to realise its full potential. Task-based approaches that hinder mental health nurse engagement with consumers may impact Safewards' effectiveness. RECOMMENDATIONS: Discrepancies between the views of mental health nurses and consumers' experiences require further exploration. Increasing consumers' involvement in the everyday application of Safewards should be considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.70171
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mental Health Nurses' Responses to Consumers' Experiences of Safewards in Acute Inpatient Mental Health Units: A Qualitative Exploratory Study

Bridget Hamilton, Brenda Happell, Antony Mullen, Stephanie Skinner
Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Mental Health Nurses' Responses to Consumers' Experiences of Safewards in Acute Inpatient Mental Health Units: A Qualitative Exploratory Study

Bridget Hamilton, Brenda Happell, Antony Mullen, Stephanie Skinner
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Safewards effectively reduces restrictive practices within acute inpatient mental health units. Consumers' experiences of Safewards impact on broader experiences within these settings. Given the influence mental health nurses have on consumers' experiences, nurses' responses to these experiences require further exploration. AIM: To explore the responses of mental health nurses to consumers' experiences of Safewards within acute inpatient mental health units. METHODS: A qualitative exploratory method was used for this study, involving semi-structured focus groups with mental health nurses from two acute inpatient mental health units. Participants were asked to respond to a summary of themes about consumers' experiences of Safewards. RESULTS: Thematic analysis uncovered three themes: (1) Prioritising respectful communication and investing time with consumers; (2) Relating Safewards to everyday work with consumers; (3) Safewards and its impact on restrictive practices. DISCUSSION: Participants acknowledged consumers' experiences of Safewards and their frustrations when mental health nurses were unavailable. Some participants expressed uncertainty about the suitability of Safewards, despite consumers' endorsement, highlighting a possible discrepancy between mental health nurses' and consumers' views. Most participants perceived Safewards to be effective but inconsistently applied, in part due to varying acceptance and understanding of Safewards. LIMITATIONS: Differences between the units may not be captured in combined data analyses and other views about the consumers' experiences of Safewards may not be represented. Researcher bias may have influenced the way in which data were collected, analysed and reported. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Safewards requires partnership between mental health nurses and consumers, and a more nuanced understanding of its application within an acute inpatient mental health setting to realise its full potential. Task-based approaches that hinder mental health nurse engagement with consumers may impact Safewards' effectiveness. RECOMMENDATIONS: Discrepancies between the views of mental health nurses and consumers' experiences require further exploration. Increasing consumers' involvement in the everyday application of Safewards should be considered.

Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing
The University of Melbourne (AU), Mental Health Australia (AU), Hunter New England Local Health District (AU), Southern Cross University (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.