Role-specific experiences of inefficiency in the biomedical research and clinical laboratory workforce

Inefficiencies impose a significant burden on healthcare workers, resulting in adverse consequences for organizations and their employees. Previous studies have explored how clinical workers perceive these inefficiencies. However, little is known about the biomedical research and clinical laboratory workforce. Open-ended survey responses from 560 biomedical research and clinical laboratory workers in a large academic medical center in the southeastern United States were analyzed using hybrid inductive-deductive qualitative thematic analysis. Employees' perceptions of tasks, processes, or systems considered duplicative, poorly designed, or unnecessary were used to describe the experience of organizational inefficiencies among biomedical research and clinical laboratory workers, and to compare experiences by professional roles. The three inefficiencies with the highest case frequency were software inefficiency (n = 55, 9.82%), appropriate staffing (n = 54, 9.64%), and communication (n = 51, 9.11%). The findings highlight potential targets for intervention and aim to guide organizational strategies that promote positive work outcomes in this understudied population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Ergonomics
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2026.104853
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role-specific experiences of inefficiency in the biomedical research and clinical laboratory workforce

A. J. Tucker, Amie Traylor, Mark C. Schall, Laurence M. Boitet et al.
Applied Ergonomics
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

Role-specific experiences of inefficiency in the biomedical research and clinical laboratory workforce

A. J. Tucker, Amie Traylor, Mark C. Schall, Laurence M. Boitet, Petra J. Sprik, David A. Rogers
article en

Abstract

Inefficiencies impose a significant burden on healthcare workers, resulting in adverse consequences for organizations and their employees. Previous studies have explored how clinical workers perceive these inefficiencies. However, little is known about the biomedical research and clinical laboratory workforce. Open-ended survey responses from 560 biomedical research and clinical laboratory workers in a large academic medical center in the southeastern United States were analyzed using hybrid inductive-deductive qualitative thematic analysis. Employees' perceptions of tasks, processes, or systems considered duplicative, poorly designed, or unnecessary were used to describe the experience of organizational inefficiencies among biomedical research and clinical laboratory workers, and to compare experiences by professional roles. The three inefficiencies with the highest case frequency were software inefficiency (n = 55, 9.82%), appropriate staffing (n = 54, 9.64%), and communication (n = 51, 9.11%). The findings highlight potential targets for intervention and aim to guide organizational strategies that promote positive work outcomes in this understudied population.

Applied ErgonomicsVol. 138
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Auburn University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.