Two hats, one purse: does holding a dual mandate affect the attraction of grants?

This study examines whether the allocation of intergovernmental grants is associated with the presence of Members of Parliament (MPs), including those holding dual mandates at the local level as mayors, aldermen, or councillors. Focusing on the Flemish region of Belgium, we analyse panel data covering 290 municipalities and 3.758 observations from 2005 to 2017. The findings indicate a consistent pattern of hometown bias: municipalities with a resident MP tend to receive higher levels of grants. At the same time, this association is not uniform across MPs. The hometown effect is largely driven by MPs affiliated with the governing majority, and by those holding dual mandates, whereas single mandate MPs are not systematically associated with higher grant allocation. Further differentiation reveals that this pattern is primarily attributable to MPs who also serve as mayors, while evidence for aldermen and councillors is weaker and less consistent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Local Government Studies
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2026.2699734
Primary Topic
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two hats, one purse: does holding a dual mandate affect the attraction of grants?

Benjamin Descamps, Carine Smolders
Local Government Studies
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
article

Two hats, one purse: does holding a dual mandate affect the attraction of grants?

Benjamin Descamps, Carine Smolders
article en

Abstract

This study examines whether the allocation of intergovernmental grants is associated with the presence of Members of Parliament (MPs), including those holding dual mandates at the local level as mayors, aldermen, or councillors. Focusing on the Flemish region of Belgium, we analyse panel data covering 290 municipalities and 3.758 observations from 2005 to 2017. The findings indicate a consistent pattern of hometown bias: municipalities with a resident MP tend to receive higher levels of grants. At the same time, this association is not uniform across MPs. The hometown effect is largely driven by MPs affiliated with the governing majority, and by those holding dual mandates, whereas single mandate MPs are not systematically associated with higher grant allocation. Further differentiation reveals that this pattern is primarily attributable to MPs who also serve as mayors, while evidence for aldermen and councillors is weaker and less consistent.

Local Government Studies
Ghent University Hospital (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.