Pathways to Dictatorship and Democracy: Indonesia and Barrington Moore*

As I began writing about the rise of Soeharto’s New Order regime in Indonesia in the early 1970s, my discovery of Barrington Moore’s seminal work, The Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, opened a door into a world beyond the modernisation theory associated with the Cold War. As a result, my analysis was increasingly framed within the general proposition that the path to the modern world was forged in conflicts over power and wealth among forces engendered within the evolution of capitalist society. Two central arguments emerge. First, modern capitalist society in Indonesia was shaped, not by a bourgeois revolution from below or by a revolution from above driven by a centralised administrative state or by the universal forces of market efficiency, but by and within a system of oligarchic domination embedded in a rentier state. Second, this was a system of rule that could not be changed at will by technocratic fiat, institutional reform, or economic crises because it constituted a social order with its own powerful vested interests able to colonise and harness democratic and market institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contemporary Asia
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2026.2697467
Primary Topic
Asian Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pathways to Dictatorship and Democracy: Indonesia and Barrington Moore*

Richard Robison
Journal of Contemporary Asia
Asian Studies and History
article

Pathways to Dictatorship and Democracy: Indonesia and Barrington Moore*

Richard Robison
article en

Abstract

As I began writing about the rise of Soeharto’s New Order regime in Indonesia in the early 1970s, my discovery of Barrington Moore’s seminal work, The Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, opened a door into a world beyond the modernisation theory associated with the Cold War. As a result, my analysis was increasingly framed within the general proposition that the path to the modern world was forged in conflicts over power and wealth among forces engendered within the evolution of capitalist society. Two central arguments emerge. First, modern capitalist society in Indonesia was shaped, not by a bourgeois revolution from below or by a revolution from above driven by a centralised administrative state or by the universal forces of market efficiency, but by and within a system of oligarchic domination embedded in a rentier state. Second, this was a system of rule that could not be changed at will by technocratic fiat, institutional reform, or economic crises because it constituted a social order with its own powerful vested interests able to colonise and harness democratic and market institutions.

Journal of Contemporary Asia
The University of Melbourne (AU), East Asia Institute (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Asian Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.