Comparative urban environmental impacts: private gasoline cars, SAVs, and electric SAVs

This study compares the environmental impacts of three urban transport scenarios: private gasoline vehicles, gasoline-powered shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs), and electric SAVs. Using deterministic modelling, Monte Carlo simulation (5000 iterations), analysis of variance, and t-tests, the authors quantify per-capita carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions under varying occupancy, fuel consumption, and grid carbon intensity. Private gasoline cars with low occupancy (1.2 persons/vehicle) produce ≈15 000 g carbon dioxide per 100 km. Gasoline SAVs reduce emissions by ≈66% due to higher occupancy (2.5 persons) and better fuel efficiency. Electric SAVs achieve as low as 640 g carbon dioxide per 100 km, a 96% reduction against private gasoline vehicles, including indirect grid emissions (200 g CO2/kWh). Sensitivity analysis shows gasoline SAVs depend on fuel use and occupancy, while electric SAVs depend primarily on grid carbon intensity. Limitations include fixed occupancy assumptions, idealised routeing, empty-vehicle miles exclusion, and missing upstream emissions for gasoline vehicles. Full life-cycle assessment is absent. Nevertheless, combining shared mobility with electrification offers maximum urban transport decarbonisation, providing actionable insights for policymakers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.25.00195
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative urban environmental impacts: private gasoline cars, SAVs, and electric SAVs

Soheil Rezashoar, Ali A. Abdi, Arshia Attar, Mohammad Amin Ebrahimzadeh et al.
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
article

Comparative urban environmental impacts: private gasoline cars, SAVs, and electric SAVs

Soheil Rezashoar, Ali A. Abdi, Arshia Attar, Mohammad Amin Ebrahimzadeh, Saba Khodabandelouyan
article en

Abstract

This study compares the environmental impacts of three urban transport scenarios: private gasoline vehicles, gasoline-powered shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs), and electric SAVs. Using deterministic modelling, Monte Carlo simulation (5000 iterations), analysis of variance, and t-tests, the authors quantify per-capita carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions under varying occupancy, fuel consumption, and grid carbon intensity. Private gasoline cars with low occupancy (1.2 persons/vehicle) produce ≈15 000 g carbon dioxide per 100 km. Gasoline SAVs reduce emissions by ≈66% due to higher occupancy (2.5 persons) and better fuel efficiency. Electric SAVs achieve as low as 640 g carbon dioxide per 100 km, a 96% reduction against private gasoline vehicles, including indirect grid emissions (200 g CO2/kWh). Sensitivity analysis shows gasoline SAVs depend on fuel use and occupancy, while electric SAVs depend primarily on grid carbon intensity. Limitations include fixed occupancy assumptions, idealised routeing, empty-vehicle miles exclusion, and missing upstream emissions for gasoline vehicles. Full life-cycle assessment is absent. Nevertheless, combining shared mobility with electrification offers maximum urban transport decarbonisation, providing actionable insights for policymakers.

Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability
Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch (IR), Islamic Azad University, Karaj (IR), Imam Khomeini International University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.